NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) Performs Up to 63% Faster than AMD Radeon RX 7600 in 3DMark Tests

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Image: NVIDIA

3DMark scores for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) and AMD Radeon RX 7600 have surfaced online ahead of third-party reviews. According to the scores gathered by VideoCardz, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) is up to 25% faster than the Radeon RX 7600 in TimeSpy and up to 63% faster in Speed Way, 3DMark’s Direct X12 Ultimate benchmark with ray tracing, although there appears to be much more parity between the two in the Fire Strike (Direct X11) test, which only shows a one-digit performance difference. The scores also suggest that the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) is 10% faster than the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on average, while the Radeon RX 7600 offers 34% higher performance than the Radeon RX 6600.

From a VideoCardz report:

[…] the 3DMark data, especially the Graphics scores, are very consistent and comparable metrics for GPUs, especially when we include all the most popular benchmarks.

The 3DMark suite offers DX11, DX12 and now even raytracing tests. We requested FireStrike, TimeSpy and Speed Way data from reviewers to look at where both of the soon-to-be-released cards sit.

Kindly note that RTX 4060 Ti/RX7600 benchmarks were collected from multiple reviewers and the data was averaged. Both cards were using pre-launch press drivers. There is a chance that either NVIDIA or AMD could release an updated driver before launch that can affect the scores.

Image: VideoCardz
Image: VideoCardz

Join the discussion in The FPS Review Forums...

Discussion (3 replies)

Join Discussion →
Brian_B
Brian_B 👍 2

Hmm..

To start with, the 6600 paired off better against the 3060 (non-Ti), and was still mostly less expensive than the non-Ti version.

The fact that they are reporting an estimated 10% performance increase from 3060Ti to 4060Ti is ... telling. That sounds about like what I would expect given everything I've heard - with a lack of DLSS 3 to fall back on.

And most of these "up to xx% faster" claims tend to be when DLSS 3 or some other vendor-specific hack is employed and you can't get a real apples to apples comparison.

Peter_Brosdahl
Peter_Brosdahl 👍 2

Well in reading the original post on VideoCardz these numbers don't appear to be anything in-house from NV and so no magic sauce there but it's not confirmed as such either. The article repeatedly refers to "reviewers" or "multiple reviewers" without naming them. We'll see real-world tests soon enough though.

Ranulfo

Now throw in a RX 6700 and 6700xt/6750xt. Nvidia's chart last week though where most of the games they list are using dlss 3.0 to get any real gains was hilarious. That and the comparisons to a 2060Super/2070. Its time to upgrade Turing bros!

Tsing Mui
News poster at The FPS Review.

Recent News