Image: CD PROJEKT RED

CD PROJEKT RED has already teased that Cyberpunk 2077 will be a massive game, but the sci-fi action RPG may be bigger than anyone could have imagined.

Lukasz Babiel, the developer’s lead QA tester, revealed that he has already spent 175 hours on the title in a single playthrough. That level of playtime is impressive in itself, but what’s even more astounding is that he’s still not finished exploring Night City.

“[…] that’s just one of my ongoing slow paced playthroughs on the hardest difficulty where I play more stealthy than usual, loot everything, use every feature the game has to offer, I take my time,” Babiel clarified.

While speed runners and other impatient gamers are sure to blow through Cyberpunk 2077 in record time, Babiel’s experience is great news for completionists who prefer to take their time and plan to explore the RPG’s every nook and cranny.

Cyberpunk 2077 will be released for the PC, Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and Google Stadia on December 10th, 2020. Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 versions are slated for next year.

Don’t Miss Out on More FPS Review Content!

Our weekly newsletter includes a recap of our reviews and a run down of the most popular tech news that we published.

Join the Conversation

14 Comments

  1. [QUOTE=”Zarathustra, post: 24130, member: 203″]
    I’m not an ultra completionist, but I feel like I am more anal
    [/QUOTE]
    This.

  2. [QUOTE=”Denpepe, post: 24145, member: 284″]
    As long as it’s not 100 hours of gwent, ooh I hated that crap
    [/QUOTE]
    I totally admit it. I use the console codes to burn through gwent. Just not worth my time to dig into it with so many other things to do.

  3. [QUOTE=”Eduardo_Domingot, post: 24149, member: 246″]
    Hours are good but they better not make it repetitive drivel. I am not trying to slam this negatively its just too often I see the hours touted without a mention of what those hours of extra content compromise.
    [/QUOTE]
    The worst games for me for repetiveness were the Dead Space games. Loved all three but the formula got old quick and because of that and I just can’t get myself to go back and replay again because of it. It’s a shame because I really dig the story-lines. You pretty much new every time you passed a door or section that was locked it was going to make back track there again at a later point in the game. First few times, not so bad, after two to three dozen times, it got pretty old. Not hardcore into grinding either. Quality content that draws you in is where it’s at for me.

  4. Quoting QA’s time to complete the game can be misleading to say the least. Dude gets paid to explore every nook and cranny in the game from every angle. Having said that, it’s good to know there’s some side content to explore. Not to mention last month’s news about the main story being shorter than the W3’s… and I think one of their reps said in the interview that you can complete the game without actually completing the main story line. I dunno… seems like there’s a lot we just don’t know about, but since the game is so hyped up, it feels like any time a CDPR dev farts it makes headlines.

  5. [QUOTE=”Grimlakin, post: 24159, member: 215″]
    Side missions will always be… take x to y, kill or eliminate person x, or go get B and bring to C for a message to D to get X better reward. It’s near impossible to iterate beyond that really with hundreds of hours of unique missions without repetitive elements.
    [/QUOTE]
    Too true but with W3 they did manage to have a few that contributed to various aspects of the story. It was also interesting how NPC dialogs actually changed in various places as those missions were completed. Minor things but noticeable.

  6. I put well over 200 hours into Witcher 3 by the time I had finished the game and both expansions (over a period of 2 or 3 years), so I expected CP2077 to be a pretty long game out the gate. CDPR usually does a good job providing meaningful content during all those hours as well, so hopefully the same rings true with their new game. They tend to deliver value for the dollar, even at launch prices.
    [QUOTE=”Denpepe, post: 24145, member: 284″]
    As long as it’s not 100 hours of gwent, ooh I hated that crap
    [/QUOTE]
    [QUOTE=”Peter_Brosdahl, post: 24148, member: 87″]
    I totally admit it. I use the console codes to burn through gwent. Just not worth my time to dig into it with so many other things to do.
    [/QUOTE]
    I didn’t touch any of the Gwent sh1t in that game. I tried it a few times early on, and didn’t bother with it again.

  7. [QUOTE=”Peter_Brosdahl, post: 24457, member: 87″]
    [MEDIA=reddit]cyberpunkgame/comments/k2zjrf[/MEDIA]
    [/QUOTE]

    40GB? That’s about a 6-7 minute download if the servers aren’t too busy :p

  8. [QUOTE=”Grimlakin, post: 24551, member: 215″]
    Considering there are bordello’s and such in game… game played time could be higher… ahem.
    [/QUOTE]
    I don’t need much… I recently spent 200 hours planting flowers in a hospital sim…

    [ATTACH type=”full” alt=”TPH.JPG”]654[/ATTACH]

    :LOL:

    [QUOTE=”Zarathustra, post: 24577, member: 203″]
    I am unfamiliar with Gwent, but I imagine its a bit like Poker in Far Cry 3.
    [/QUOTE]
    Gwent is basically Hearthstone… but in Witcher universe.

Leave a comment