Image: Rockstar Games

Rockstar Games has shared the minimum and recommended system requirements for its upcoming collection of GTA remasters, Grand Theft Auto: The Trilogy – The Definitive Edition. An Intel Core i7-2700K / AMD Ryzen 5 2600 processor, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 / AMD Radeon RX 570 graphics card, and 16 GB of memory are listed for the recommended experience. The game will require 45 GB of free storage space.

Minimum

  • OS: Windows 10 64-bit
  • Processor: Intel Core i5-6600K / AMD FX-6300
  • Memory: 8 GB
  • Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2 GB / AMD Radeon R9 280 3 GB
  • Disk: 45 GB

Recommended

  • OS: Windows 10 64-bit
  • Processor: Intel Core i7-2700K / AMD Ryzen 5 2600
  • Memory: 16GB
  • Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4 GB / AMD Radeon RX 570 4 GB
  • Disk: 45GB

Rockstar on Friday confirmed that Grand Theft Auto: The Trilogy – The Definitive Edition would be released for PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X|S, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 4, Xbox One, and the Rockstar Games Launcher on November 11. Portions of the game are also coming to cloud services: Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas – The Definitive Edition is coming to Xbox Game Pass starting on November 11, while Grand Theft Auto III – The Definitive Edition will be available on PlayStation Now starting December 7.

Grand Theft Auto: The Trilogy – The Definitive Edition will launch at a price point of $59.99.

Source: Rockstar Games

Don’t Miss Out on More FPS Review Content!

Our weekly newsletter includes a recap of our reviews and a run down of the most popular tech news that we published.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. Hmm. Neither of these are new, but there’s a decent gap between them

    [QUOTE]
    OS: Windows 10 64-bitProcessor: Intel Core i5-6600K / AMD FX-6300
    [/QUOTE]

    One was released in Sept 2015, the other Oct 2012. I’d also point out the Intel is relatively recent architecture, as they are just now starting to finally move away from Skylake, whereas FX generation everyone wants to kinda forget about.

    Odd to see FX anywhere anymore.

    Nothing significant, just interesting.

  2. [QUOTE=”Brian_B, post: 42934, member: 96″]
    Hmm. Neither of these are new, but there’s a decent gap between them

    One was released in Sept 2015, the other Oct 2012. I’d also point out the Intel is relatively recent architecture, as they are just now starting to finally move away from Skylake, whereas FX generation everyone wants to kinda forget about.

    Odd to see FX anywhere anymore.

    Nothing significant, just interesting.
    [/QUOTE]
    [QUOTE]
    OS: Windows 10 64-bitProcessor: Intel Core i7-2700K
    [/QUOTE]

    I found that one as recommended more suprisingly, as if they switched recommended and minimum around on the intel parts even though that one is 4c/8t and the other 4c/4t

Leave a comment