Test Setup
Bringing On The Heat
For 2022, we have updated the Case Review Rig with a 10900K, supported by an MSI Z490 motherboard for ATX case reviews, cooled by a be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 cooler that has a third be quiet! Silent Wings 3 fan installed. This CPU is capable of pulling up to 300W when stressed, though for our purposes it will be limited to 260W for overclocked testing, due to the 250W spec of the Dark Rock Pro 4 CPU cooler and to ensure the longevity of the Case Review Rig.
Standing in for the ASUS 5700XT is an MSI RX6800 Gaming X Trio. This card pulls about 245W under overclocked load and is even longer at 324mm.
Together, these two components allow us to put overclocked loads of around 500W during gaming and around 750W overclocked loads during synthetic testing to really show how well a particular case shines.
Please note that while these are not the most recently released components, they were chosen specifically for their ability to draw power and emit heat when pushed. The intent of this component selection is to provide power draw baselines for readers to compare against other components on the market, regardless of vendor. With respect to the Case Review Rig, the results from The FPS Review case reviews are intended to be brand agnostic.
This means that the results shouldn’t be interpreted primarily as “a 10900K really can draw a lot of heat!”. Obviously, this is a true statement, but we instead ask our readers to try to view the results as “The Cooler Master HAF 500 can handle a combined 260W CPU load and 240W GPU load entirely on air”. This is a case review, not a review of the test rig – the major components used have been previously reviewed by this site.
Notes About Specific Components Used
For the GPU, a Cooler Master MasterAccessory ARGB 3-Pin GPU Support Bracket was used to keep the rather large and heavy card from sagging. This isn’t a problem with the HAF 500, but rather due diligence on our part to preserve the longevity of this GPU. Cooler Master’s support bracket also adds RGB lighting functionality.
Controlling Fans with Argus Monitor
Cooler Master’s inclusion of a dedicated fan for directing airflow to the GPU presented a problem: how to control that fan?
Generally speaking, games will load the GPU far more than the CPU, and consistently more so, which means that the usual BIOS options for controlling fan speed are unlikely to be helpful. We wanted to ensure that the GPU accessory fan would ramp up to cool the GPU regardless of CPU load.
Enter Argus Monitor, a paid option for tying fan speeds to various temperature readings. For this review, we used Argus Monitor to tie the GPU accessory fan to GPU heat, left the fans on the CPU cooler tied to CPU package temperature, and set the intake and exhaust fans to ramp with whichever of the CPU or GPU was hottest to ensure sufficient airflow.
While Cooler Master did include a fan and RGB distributer, we opted not to use this for fan control, and instead relied on the fan headers available on the MSI motherboard, with Argus Monitor running the fans in Windows.
RGB Lighting
Cooler Master has shipped the HAF 700 with ARGB-equipped fans in the front and rear. Typically we can’t comment on the quality of a case’s lighting if no lighting is included, but it’s worth noting with the HAF 700 that the fans tend toward the blue end of the spectrum.
Because we only have two ARGB headers on our MSI motherboard, we didn’t try to get the fans to match each other along with the GPU support bracket – each RGB device has a different interpretation of ‘white’, as does the Corsair memory and the ASUS GPU.
For this review, all lighting is set to ‘white’ as available in appropriate software suites, defined as #FFFFFF or 255 / 255 / 255.
Discussion (6 replies)
Join Discussion →It looks like my View 51 TG. I think that's a format a lot of companies are switching to.
Yup - ASUS' new case is dual-chamber, and looks a lot like Lian Li's O11 lineup as well. Works if you're not terribly worried about footprint!
Nice review. I enjoy a large case to work in like my 7000D, so this gets my attention. It's nice to see CM offer something similar to the HAF 700 EVO, but with a much cheaper price tag. I looked at the C700M a year or so ago, but what turned me off of CM and that case was all the negative reviews for build quality and/or quirks. Even the HAF 700 EVO basically gets those same reviews based on some searches I've done. It's nice to see that this case is built well, so maybe CM has stepped up their game a little recently.
We didn't get a chance to review the HAF 700 EVO - and from what I can tell, the HAF 700 seems to be a 'de-tech'd' version of that case.
However, Cooler Master could easily have given the design a onceover to address criticisms. For my part, the HAF 700 had no issues with build quality, and no quirks that stood out negatively, other than the size, obviously :).
Thanks, @LazyGamer for the great review. I'm not going to be jumping ship from my Carbide but something like this might be on the horizon for the next build. I like how you can put 2x360 mm radiators side-by-side. That's a detail now on my radar with the latest build.
It's a wide one...