AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPU Performance

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Rendering Performance

We will now take a look at how rendering performance compares.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench R23 CPU Multi-Core Graph

In Cinebench R23, the rendering performance backs up the system testing in 3DMark and Geekbench as it relates to multi-core performance. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 36268, which is 6% slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X at 38605. The Ryzen 9 7950X is 6% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D when all the cores are maxed out in performance, meaning the 7950X is faster.

Cinebench R23 CPU Single-Core Graph

But, in single-thread performance the tables even out between the CPUs. Here the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1% faster than the Ryzen 9 7950X, or basically the same performance. This backups the 3DMark and Geekbench testing as well were both CPUs are the same in single-thread performance.

Blender Open Data Benchmark

Take note, the Blender Open Data Benchmark has changed, it now runs 3 scenes and spits out a “Samples per Minute” number, where higher samples are better.

Blender Benchmark monster graph

Blender utilizes all the cores to render 3D models, and this once again shows that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 272.8 samples per minute, which is 4% slower than the Ryzen 9 7590X. The 7950X is 4% faster than the Ryzen 9 7590X3D for modeling the monster scene in Blender.

Blender Benchmark junkshop graph

In junkshop, we see the same, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2% slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X.

Blender Benchmark classroom graph

In classroom, we also see the Ryzen 9 7950X3D at 5% slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X for 3D modeling.

V-RAY 5 Benchmark

V-Ray 5 Benchmark graph

V-Ray 5 is another benchmark testing 3D performance in vsamples. Following all the other benchmarks, this very multi-threaded benchmark shows the Ryzen 9 7950X3D falling behind the Ryzen 9 7950X by 5% in performance.

HandBrake

We are going to test HandBrake performance encoding a 10-minute video using two different media formats, H.264 and AV1 on the CPU only. Remember, we are looking for the lowest time to encode here, the lowest result is the better one.

HandBrake Creator 2160p60 4K H.264 preset graph

In this first test, we are rendering using the Creator preset at 2160p60 4K H.264 preset on a 10-minute video which was recorded at 1440p, therefore it is upscaling the video. Our tests show that the fastest CPU is the Ryzen 9 7950X, not the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D rendered the video in 9 minutes and 49 seconds, while the Ryzen 9 7950X rendered it in 9 minutes and 21 seconds, an almost 30-second difference. This isn’t large, but consider if your video took hours to render, the difference would add up and matter more then.

HandBrake Fast 2160p60 4K AV1 preset graph

In this test, we are testing the new AV1 codec in the Fast 2160p60 4K AV1 preset, which is upscaling the video to 4K. As the time to render is longer, the difference widens between the CPUs. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D took 33 minutes and 15 seconds, while the Ryzen 9 7950X took 31 minutes and 50 seconds, a difference of close to 2 minutes. That again can make a pretty big difference if you are rendering hours of video.

Join the discussion in our forums...

REVIEW OVERVIEW

Performance
8
Efficiency (Perf per Watt)
10
Features
10
Value
6

SUMMARY

We compare the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in the application and synthetic benchmark comparisons. In this application-focused review, we find out the overall big picture of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D when it comes to application performance. The CPU fell behind the Ryzen 9 7950X between 2%-10% in multi-threaded performance. However, it did equal it in single-threaded performance. It had much better performance per Watt efficiency and operated at lower power while being loaded with features. Considering the higher price for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D compared to Ryzen 9 7950X, we find the 7950X has better value for content creators and office application work.
Brent Justicehttps://www.thefpsreview.com
Former managing editor of GPUs at HardOCP for 18 years, Brent Justice has been reviewing computer components since the late 90s, educated in the art and method of the computer hardware review, he brings experience, knowledge, and hands-on testing with a gamer-oriented and hardware enthusiast perspective. You can follow him on Twitter - @Brent_Justice You can sub to his YouTube channel - Justice Gaming https://www.youtube.com/c/JusticeGamingChannel You can check out his computer builds on KIT - @BrentJustice https://kit.co/BrentJustice

Recent News

We compare the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in the application and synthetic benchmark comparisons. In this application-focused review, we find out the overall big picture of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D when it comes to application performance. The CPU fell behind the Ryzen 9 7950X between 2%-10% in multi-threaded performance. However, it did equal it in single-threaded performance. It had much better performance per Watt efficiency and operated at lower power while being loaded with features. Considering the higher price for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D compared to Ryzen 9 7950X, we find the 7950X has better value for content creators and office application work.AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X CPU Performance