Synthetic Benchmarks
PCMark 10
Starting the bidding with the PCMark 10, we found that the KLEVV Bolt zapped its way to 9906 PCMarks, which was about a percent slower than the Addgame Spider X5’s showing in the same test. Overclocking the KLEVV Bolt V added 10 whole additional PCMarks to its stash.
Geekbench 6 (Multicore)
On the Geekbench 6 front, the KLEVV Bolt V turned in a score of 21,059 which was sufficient to best the Addgame Spider X5 by about 6 points. Overclocking the KLEVV Bolt V found another 27 points to win the overall match up.
Geekbench 6 (Singlecore)
On Geekbench 6 single-core front, the KLEVV Bolt V provided some disappointment for us at 2908 points, which was several percent lower than the Addgame Spider X5. Overclocking the KLEVV Bolt V brought it to the lead with 3033 points.
AIDA64 Memory Read
Looking at raw memory read scores, we found the KLEVV Bolt V at 99,859 MB/s which was about 800 MB/s slower than the Addgame Spider X5’s offering. Overclocking the KLEVV Bolt V brought it back to the lead with a total read speed of 103,438 MB/s.
AIDA64 Memory Write
When it comes to AIDA64’s memory write test, the KLEVV Bolt V achieved a total speed of 87,158 MB/s which was about 250 MB/s slower than the Addgame Spider X5. Overclocking boosted the write rate on the KLEVV Bolt V to 89,800 MB/s.
AIDA64CPU Queen
Shifting over to AIDA64’s CPU Queen test, we found a fairly level playing field with the KLEVV Bolt V out front at 158,750 points which was 311 higher than the Addgame Spider X5. Overclocking the KLEVV Bolt V brought down the overall score by a couple of hundred points to round out the test.
AIDA64 SHA3
For AIDA’s SHA3 test, all three scenarios landed within a rounding error each other with the KLEVV Bolt V at 9,176 points which was four under the Addgame Spider X5. Overclocking added a little additional point to the KLEVV efforts.
CineBench R23 (Multi Core)
On the multicore Cinebench R23 front, the KLEVV Bolt V delivered a score of 37,823 which was over 1500 points lower than the Addgame Spider X5’s score of 39,470. We re-ran this test several times on both the Addgame and KLEVV memory kits and the results were consistent from run to run – this level of difference is not expected for such similar spec’ed memory. Overclocking the KLEVV Bolt V put it back in the winner’s circle at 40,021 points.
CineBench R23 (Single Core)
Moving on to the single-core test within Cinebench R23, the gap was not nearly as dramatic with the KLEVV Bolt 5 landing at 2,166 points, just 1.5% below the Addgame Spider X5. Overclocking the KLEVV Bolt V split the difference between the two stock efforts in the chart.
VRay 5
Closing out the synthetic benchmark testing, we have VRay 5 where we saw a similar performance profile to the Cinebench R23 results with the KLEVV Bolt 5 chalking up 26,547 points, which was about 3.4% below the Addgame Spider X5’s efforts. Again, overclocking the KLEVV Bolt V split the difference in the performance difference of the two stock-clocked scenarios.