Alienware has announced the AW3423DWF, a new 34-inch curved QD-OLED gaming monitor that matches the original AW3423DW’s panel technology, WQHD (3440 x 1440) resolution, 0.1 ms GtG response time, and other qualities, but at a lower price point. The new monitor is priced at $1,099.00, $200 less than what the AW3423DW is currently listed for on the official Dell shop. Some of the differences include an all gray/black design, 165 vs. 175 Hz refresh rate, and 1x HDMI 2.0 port and 2x DisplayPort 1.4 ports vs. 2x HDMI 2.0 ports and 1x DisplayPort 1.4.
- AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and VESA AdaptiveSync Display certification: Experience tear-free, low-latency, HDR gaming.
- 165Hz Native Refresh Rate: Allow fast-moving graphics to be seen with incredible clarity so gamers can react quicker in the game.
- New OSD Joystick: Access various preset game modes (FPS, MOBA/RTS, RPG), and easily switch to the new Creator mode if you’re a gamer who also creates content.
- TUV-certified ComfortView Plus: Helps reduce blue-light emissions without sacrificing any of the brilliant QD-OLED colors.
From a Dell press release:
Hot off unveiling the world’s first QD-OLED gaming monitor earlier this year – subsequently named Tom’s Guide Product of the Year and GamesRadar+ Best Ultrawide Monitor – we’re continuing to expand our QD-OLED offerings with the introduction of a new Alienware 34 Curved QD-OLED Gaming Monitor (AW3423DWF), delivering a premier and immersive gaming experience now at USD $1,099.99 or CAD $1,399.99.
For those seeking increased realism the Alienware 34″ Curved QD-OLED Gaming Monitor delivers stunning picture quality and ultra-smooth frame rates that transform your entire gaming experience. Just like the previously launched AW3423DW model, this new monitor offers the same impressive picture qualities of Quantum Dot-OLED technology including consistent color uniformity, wide color coverage, deep black tones and incredible brightness. With WQHD (3440 x 1440) resolution and blazing-fast 0.1ms GtG response time, gamers can stay ahead of the competition without stuttering, input lag or motion blur while playing fast-paced games. It also supports the latest generation of consoles with VRR up to 120Hz.
Discussion (10 replies)
Join Discussion →Affordable, such a relative term and in gaming relativity I don't think anyone thinks "$1100" is considered affordable. Who comes up with this crap?
People wanting to sell 4090 video cards to drive them.
I've been in the $1000-$1500 range for a while with monitors, ever since I got the LG31MU97 back around 2015, but I've never considered that price point an "affordable" kind of term. It's halo and those that go for $2K-$4K are just insane. So happy with the LG C2 and have no regrets nor any inclination for anything else for a long time.
Edit: Just noticed those LG C2's have dropped by $300+ to ~$1149
QD-OLED @ 1440p - NO! I'm probably going to replace my very used, very aged U3011 with the 55" A95K.
Yeah I have been sorely tempted, if I didn't have a dozen other things pulling at my wallet right now
Affordable would be $200. This is not that.
The title doesn't say anything about it being an affordable monitor, just that it's more affordable (presumably in comparison to something else, such as the AW3423DW). Can't people read? ;)
Kidding aside, my reaction was similar to others. I usually expect to see something priced in the "value" or budget category when the term affordable is present, and the comparative form does not change that.
I'm pretty happy with CX 48" as well. I thought about the 42" C2 though as it is a tad smaller. Picture quality doesn't seem to be any different than the CX though.
"Whatcha talkin' 'bout?! You don't know? This is Alienware, baby, so ofc this is more affordable because we say so from our not so affordable sniz! WE'RE PREMIUM, baby! You haven't heard?!" /s ?
"More affordable" = "not quite affordable but closer than before"