Mark Hamill Has Had “Enough” of Luke Skywalker

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Image: Lucasfilm

Has Mark Hamill finally cast his lightsaber aside? In a new interview with CBS News, Hamill, who turns 72 this year but will forever remain known for playing Luke Skywalker in Star Wars despite a lengthy resume, implied that he won’t be returning to the role again, noting that he has had “enough” of the character, who audiences last saw in Disney’s sequel trilogy and the season two finale of The Mandalorian with Pedro Pascal. While Hamill was smart enough not to rule things out entirely (read: Disney bucks), the actor presented the idea that Star Wars doesn’t need Luke anymore.

From a CBS News feature:

He can’t (and won’t) say if he’ll ever return. “I had my time, and that’s good,” he said. “But that’s enough.”

Smith asked, “So, even though you say you won’t go back, there’s always a chance that you could go back?”

“Well, you never say never. I just don’t see any reason to. Let me put it that way: I mean, they have so many stories to tell, they don’t need Luke anymore.”

“You know that a lot of people out there would argue, ‘They always need Luke,'” said Smith.

Hamill laughed.

And even if he never picks up another light saber, the role will always be a part of him.

Smith asked, “At this point, you could basically win a Grammy, cure cancer, and still forever you are going to be Luke Skywalker. Have you accepted that?”

“Yeah. Well, I don’t care,” Hamill said. “I mean, the truth of the matter is, I never really expected to be remembered for anything. I just wanted to make a living doing what I liked. And I thought, ‘Well, it could be worse. I could be, like, known as being the best actor who ever played Adolf Hitler, you know?’ At least Luke is an admirable fellow!”

Join the discussion in The FPS Review Forums...

Discussion (6 replies)

Join Discussion →
MadMummy76
MadMummy76

Correction: Star Wars needs a lot more than Luke Skywalker to save it from going down the tubes and recapture its past glory.

Everybody hated on the prequels but while they were inferior movies they did not damage the actual SW brand, unlike the sequels and the 101 spinoffs. I think the only Disney star Wars production that didn't leave the brand in a worse position than it was before was Rogue One. Except maybe for Andor, which I reserve judgement on as I haven't seen it and I've heard conflicting opinions about it.

Grimlakin
Grimlakin

"MadMummy76, post: 72051, member: 1298" wrote:

Correction: Star Wars needs a lot more than Luke Skywalker to save it from going down the tubes and recapture its past glory.



Everybody hated on the prequels but while they were inferior movies they did not damage the actual SW brand, unlike the sequels and the 101 spinoffs. I think the only Disney star Wars production that didn't leave the brand in a worse position than it was before was Rogue One. Except maybe for Andor, which I reserve judgement on as I haven't seen it and I've heard conflicting opinions about it.


You need to watch Rogue one. It Avoids the cardinal sin that SO MANY 'spy' or 'mystery' or 'heist' movies do today... and it DOES NOT SPELL THINGS OUT.

Quite honestly... I'm so FLIPPING TIRED of Americanized movies designed to make the average person feel smart. "Humperdido I figgured it out." No shit sherlock... so did my miniature schnauzer while high on crack and meth. THE HAD BIG RED ARROWS SAYING THIS IS IT!"

Sorry... rant kind of over. 1. Andor is entertaining. 2. Andor is NOT to be consumed without thought.

if you want popcorn star wars watch literally anything else. You'll be fine. "MEESA GOING HOME."

MadMummy76
MadMummy76 👍 1

"Grimlakin, post: 72057, member: 215" wrote:

You need to watch Rogue one.


Sorry, you are replying to me, but it does not seem like you have read my post :unsure:

Niner51
Niner51 👍 2

The character has run its course honestly. I don't blame him for wanting to move on.

Peter_Brosdahl
Peter_Brosdahl 👍 1

"Niner51, post: 72078, member: 106" wrote:

The character has run its course honestly. I don't blame him for wanting to move on.


Yep, and at this point they can use AI to recycle ad infinitum.

Grimlakin
Grimlakin 👍 3

"Peter_Brosdahl, post: 72083, member: 87" wrote:

Yep, and at this point they can use AI to recycle ad infinitum.


I imagine after ALL of the toy money loss he's been smarter and has his likeness protected where it can't be used without him getting a check. Also the same for his voice given his extensive history of voice acting as well.

Tsing Mui
News poster at The FPS Review.

Recent News