NVIDIA and AMD Called Out for Strange Graphics Card Benchmarks

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.


Enthusiasts and tech publications are calling NVIDIA and AMD out for publishing weird benchmarks that seem either unnecessary or, worse, make their newer products seem underwhelming compared to their predecessors.

NVIDIA, for one, decided to update its landing page for the GeForce RTX 3050 with benchmarks that pit the new budget option against the GeForce GTX 1650 and GeForce GTX 1050, two older graphics cards that were initially released in April 2019 and October 2016, respectively. Naturally, the benchmarks confirm that the new GeForce RTX 3050 blows away its older siblings, particularly when ray tracing is thrown into the mix.


AMD’s marketing department also did something odd with one of its most recently announced graphics solutions. As spotted by Hardwareluxx editor Andreas Schilling, red team has published first-party benchmarks comparing its new Radeon Pro W6400, a desktop graphics card designed for mainstream workstation usage, with a Radeon Pro WX 3200.

The benchmarks that red team shared suggest that the new Radeon Pro W6400 may be underwhelming for users who were expecting a substantial leap in performance; it is merely “comparable” in some respects, according to the company’s own verbiage. AMD launched the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in July 2019.

Via: Andreas Schilling, HXL

Tsing Mui
Tsing has been writing the news for over 5 years, first at [H]ard|OCP and now at The FPS Review. He has a background in journalism and makes sure to give his readers the relevant context to why each news post matters.

Recent News