Synthetic Benchmarks
PCMark 10
Starting off the benchmarking ceremonies, we see the stock configured DDR5-4800 take the lead over the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory by a margin of 1.4%. Overclocking closes a majority of the gap.
Looking at the subscores, the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory took the lead on both the Essentials and Digital Content Creation Scores but lagging behind on the productivity side killed its overall score.
Geekbench 5 (Multicore)
Moving on to Geekbench 5, we see the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory post a 6.5% win over the stock DDR5 speeds. Overclocking yielded a fraction of a percentage boost.
Geekbench 5 (Singlecore)
On the single core side of Geekbench 5, we saw the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory takes the lead over the DDR5-4800. Overclocking actually turned in lower scores, which leads us to believe that timings are a bit more important than overall speed in this test.
AIDA64 Memory Read
On AIDA64’s Memory Read test, we find the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory turning in a 94,364 MB/s score, which is a straight 25% boost over DDR4-4800. Overclocking finds an extra 2.9% memory to read in the same amount of time.
AIDA64 Memory Write
On AIDA 64’sMemory Write test, the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory scribbled down 84,269 MB/s which was 22% more scribbles than the DDR5-4800. Overclocking found an extra 2% performance in the scribbling department.
AIDA64CPU Queen
On the AIDA64 CPU Queen test, we find the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory at the top of the charts, besting the DDR5-4800 entrant by 209 points. Overclocking fell behind in the total score, though, at the end of the day, the 209-point gap on a scale over 100k is a bit irrelevant.
AIDA64 SHA3
On the AIDA64 SHA3 test, we found the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory and DDR5-4800 performed the same, however, overclocking yielded an extra 1.3% in performance.
CineBench R23 (Multi Core)
In Cinebench R23, we found the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory to lead the DDR5-4800 and the overclocked version itself. Overall, the multicore side of things seems to care more about latency than bandwidth.
CineBench R23 (Single Core)
On the single core side of Cinebench R23, we see similar results to the multicore, where the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory takes the lead and the others follow in the order of latency.
VRay 5
Finally, in VRay5, we found the CORSAIR VENGEANCE DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) 6000MHz Memory at the top of the charts, 1.6% faster than the DDR5-4800. Overclocking shaved a few points off, indicating latency to be more important here.