Overclocking SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 7800 XT 16GB GAMING OC
To overclock the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 7800 XT 16GB Gaming OC video card we are going to use the built-in overclocking performance tuning in AMD Radeon software drivers.


When we open up the Performance Tuning and hit Custom, we find that we can control GPU, memory, fan, and Power Tuning on the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 7800 XT 16GB Gaming OC video card. We cannot, however, raise the Voltage. We can set a maximum Power Tuning slider to a maximum of 15% over the default on the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 7800 XT 16GB Gaming OC. We can also enable 100% fan speeds to ensure the highest overclock.
Due to the way AMD GPU frequency scaling works, which is very dynamic, we can simply raise the Max Frequency slider in increments until we find the highest overclock, or maximum allowable clock speed. We moved the slider up in 200MHz increments, all the way up to 3300MHz, with very little effect on the actual clock speed while gaming.
We settled on 3000MHz as our “highest” overclock setting, but in reality no matter what we did the actual clock speed while gaming barely moved, no matter what the slider was at. We did notice that the power draw increased, so something was happening, but apparently, the GPU is “maxed out” at its factory overclocked settings already. The power limit, even with 15%, just isn’t enough to realize any meaningful GPU frequency improvements. Still, for our overclock testing, we did leave this slider at 3000MHz as that is technically about 400MHz higher than the default setting was, so it is “overclocked.”
We were able to overclock the memory higher, however, with a noticeable increase that was measured. The default memory frequency is 19.5GHz on the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 7800 XT 16GB Gaming OC video card, which is the reference spec. We managed to push it up to 2626MHz or 21GHz, an increase of 1.5GHz. At 22GHz, the computer locked up with a black screen, but 21GHz worked just fine. Therefore, the memory in our overclock was running at 21GHz for the overclocking results. This improved bandwidth to 672GB/s from the default of 624GB/s.
Therefore, our final overclock for the overclock data in this review is: 3000MHz/21GHz.

In the graph above, we have graphed out the default (blue line) GPU clock frequency to our overclocked (orange line) GPU frequency as reported by the single metric in GPU-Z. The factory overclock boost is set at 2565MHz on the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 7800 XT 16GB Gaming OC, and the game clock is set to 2254MHz. According to this, we did max out at this level, but we did not sustain that potential GPU boost. The frequency hovered between 2500MHz-2540MHz primarily while gaming, at default. This is higher than the game clock of 2254MHz, which is what the game clock is set to, therefore it did come close to the boost, and higher than the game clock.
All of this is faster than the reference made-by-AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT. The made-by-AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT had an average clock speed of 2381MHz, while the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 7800 XT 16GB Gaming OC had an average clock speed of 2530MHz. Therefore, the factory overclock on the SAPPHIRE NITRO+ RX 7800 XT 16GB Gaming OC is offering a 6% clock boost over the reference made-by-AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT out-of-the-box.
Looking at our overclocking results, we can see that what overclocking helped with the most was minimizing the minimum frequencies of the GPU clock. We are now sustaining between 2520MHz-2560MHz while gaming. It isn’t much, very small in fact, but it is a difference nonetheless. The average clock speed of the overclock is 2545MHz. This is only 15MHz higher than the default clock speed, and this shows what we are talking about. Overclocking just isn’t really eeking out much more GPU clock frequency here, the GPU is already operating at the top end of its capability out-of-the-box. There isn’t a lot of headroom left out of the Radeon RX 7800 XT GPU at this power level.



Discussion (7 replies)
Join Discussion →So AMD gives you close to RTX 4070Ti at less than RTX4070 price.
Time for an nvidia price drop yeeeeeeeeeeey ;) :D :D(y)
The only thing killing my desire for an AMD Graphics solution is the power draw.. sweet jesus they need help in efficiency in the worst way!
[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.microcenter.com/product/670769/sapphire-technology-amd-radeon-rx-7800-xt-nitro-plus-triple-fan-16gb-gddr6-pcie-40-graphics-card[/URL]
Is this worth the $70 premium over the Asrock? Yeah the boost on the Sapphire is higher but is $70 higher? https://www.microcenter.com/product/670429/asrock-amd-radeon-rx-7800-xt-challenger-overclocked-dual-fan-16gb-gddr6-pcie-40-graphics-card
edit - the Asrock 3 fan edition might be a closer match and it's still $50 cheaper : https://www.microcenter.com/product/670431/asrock-amd-radeon-rx-7800-xt-phantom-gaming-overclocked-triple-fan-16gb-gddr6-pcie-40-graphics-card
I thought no one cared about power in a desktop. That's why everyone is getting 1kW+ PSUs isn't it?
Yeah, it's funny when the exact same people who defended the nvidia 30 series power draw and said it wasn't important are now the ones bitching about Radeon power draw.
I don't care if a card draws a lot of power. Just give me the performance.
Ok s
Don't get me wrong, I care about efficiency. I just chuckle when I see people saying "I need a 1K+ PSU for my 4090 at 600W that's melting connectors" and then see people say "OMG 270W is too much!" in the same forum.
To be fair - this card is throwing out 4070 FE / Titype numbers, and nVidia pulls that at about 200W-260W depending on which side of that performance delta you want to flip over to (based on reviews published on this site, if you want to go check). AMD takes about 270W for the same performance. So yeah, it's a fair point that nVidia has a bit of an efficiency edge - but it isn't by a landslide.
In a mobile device, yeah 10-20W matters a good deal. In a desktop? That's almost a rounding error. Even if you are comparing it to the 4070, 70W at this range is significant, but not anything you'd have to go out of your way to build around - not like, say, a card that pulls 500W anyway... All the cards in this weight class (4070s and 7800s) are 200-300W cards - what we would have been top of the line with respect to thermal power a few years ago. But comparing it to today's power hungry top tier cards, these aren't anything terrible.