Intel Core i9-14900K Microcode 0x129 BIOS Fix: Before vs After Performance Benchmarks

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Synthetic System Benchmarks

On this page, we will show synthetic benchmarks, some that test a variety of system use-case scenarios, and others that test specific multi-core and single-core/thread workloads to hone in on performance differences. Note that the graphs are arranged from fastest to slowest, and the bars highlighted in blue are with Microcode 0x129 in place, while the grey bars are the previous BIOS version without the Microcode fix.

Geekbench 6

We are using Geekbench version 6.3.0 for our testing. We will show Multi-Core (nT) and Single-Core (1T) performance in separate graphs.

Intel Core i9-14900K Microcode 0x129 BIOS Fix Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark Multi-Core

According to Geekbench Multi-Core testing, installing the BIOS with the Intel Microde Fix 0x129 reduces performance by just 0.3% in the Extreme Profile mode. In the Performance Profile mode, the new Microcode Fix 0x129 decreases performance by just 0.18%. Therefore, there is no significant downgrade or change in performance in this Multi-Core test in Geekbench 6.

Intel Core i9-14900K Microcode 0x129 BIOS Fix Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark Single-Core

In Geekbench 6’s Single-Core performance testing, the Intel Core i9-14900K in the Extreme Profile with the Microcode Fix 0x129 decreases performance only by 0.15%. In the Performance Profile, the Microcode Fix 0x129 decreases performance only by 0.15% as well. Therefore, at least according to Geekbench, there is no significant change in single-core performance.

3DMark CPU Profile

We are testing 3DMark’s CPU Profile which tests Max Thread performance and Single Thread performance, we are reporting both on separate graphs.

Intel Core i9-14900K Microcode 0x129 BIOS Fix 3DMark CPU Profile Max Threads

In 3DMark’s CPU Profile test, the Intel Core i9-14900K with the Microcode Fix 0x129 applied reduces performance by a small 0.36% in the Extreme Profile. In the Performance Profile, there is a slightly higher benchmarkable, difference of 0.39% by applying the Microcode Fix 0x129. Overall, these numbers are rather insignificant in performance differences.

Intel Core i9-14900K Microcode 0x129 BIOS Fix 3DMark CPU Profile 1-Thread

In 3DMark’s 1-Thread testing, we find that the Microcode Fix 0x129 has the exact same performance as before the update, in the Extreme Profile. In the Performance Profile, there’s just a 1-point difference with the Microcode Fix 0x129 update, so no change really.

PerformanceTest 11

Intel Core i9-14900K Microcode 0x129 BIOS Fix PerformanceTest 11 PassMark CPU Mark

In PassMark PerformanceTest 11 CPU Mark test, the Intel Core i9-14900K in the Extreme Profile actually gains performance with the Microcode Fix 0x129 applied by 1.1%. In the Performance Profile, the difference is only 0.06%, so it’s the same performance overall.

Join the discussion in our forums...

Brent Justicehttps://www.thefpsreview.com
Former managing editor of GPUs at HardOCP for 18 years, Brent Justice has been reviewing computer components since the late 90s, educated in the art and method of the computer hardware review, he brings experience, knowledge, and hands-on testing with a gamer-oriented and hardware enthusiast perspective. You can follow him on Twitter - @Brent_Justice You can sub to his YouTube channel - Justice Gaming https://www.youtube.com/c/JusticeGamingChannel You can check out his computer builds on KIT - @BrentJustice https://kit.co/BrentJustice

Recent News