Introduction

MSI is a company that’s well known throughout the industry. The company has certainly taken some hits to its reputation. One of those hits came awhile back now regarding the company’s budget offerings and its VRM’s.

In response, MSI set out to right its reputation with the MSI MEG X570 Unify and later on, its X570 Tomahawk. These motherboards do indeed come with a good VRM implementation. While we haven’t tested the latter, we have tested the former.

So, what would happen if we paired the MSI X570-A PRO with a 12 core Ryzen 9 3900X? We figured we would find out for ourselves and see if the VRM reputation holds up.

We’ve always had a good working and professional relationship with MSI. They’ve been a supporter of this website from the beginning, supplying us with support and hardware for our earliest reviews. This MSI X570-A PRO motherboard we are reviewing today was bought by us, however, and not supplied.

MSI X570-A PRO

The MSI X570-A PRO is a very inexpensive motherboard from MSI. At the time of this writing, it can be had for around $139.99 and is one of the cheapest motherboards utilizing AMD’s venerable premium X570 chipset. This cheaper price does need to be taken into consideration moving forward, a price point such as this comes with its own expectations. We have to put ourselves into the mindset of this price range, and what components the end-user is installing around it.

As a result of the lower price point, it is a very lean motherboard in the feature set. It supports everything native to the chipset, and that’s pretty much it. The audio and network implementations are present but you won’t find a wireless solution here.

The motherboard is a socket AM4 motherboard utilizing the X570 chipset as its name implies. It supports a wealth of AM4 compatible CPUs, including the Ryzen 5000 series which we have yet to review.

Packaging

The packaging is standard but aesthetically pleasing. It sufficiently protects the motherboard during shipment as this is effectively the same packaging motherboards have used for a couple of decades now. Inside the packaging, you’ll find the usual accessories: Driver disc, product registration card, user manual, SATA cables, quick installation guide, and an I/O shield.

Motherboard PCB Layout and Features

The layout of the PCB is quite good. Of course, designing a good layout is much easier for motherboards with fewer integrated features. The layout actually checks off a lot of boxes in that the location of slots, ports, headers, etc. are all ideal. The CMOS battery location could be a little better here as some video card cooling solutions will force the removal of the GPU in order to remove the battery. This is a minor concern and it won’t affect very many people. You need a three-slot cooler on your graphics card for this to be an issue.

Beyond that, there is surprisingly little to talk about. The PCB has six 4-pin fan headers. One is a dedicated water-pump header, another is for the CPU with Ryzen processor support. The rest are located at the bottom of the motherboard when mounted in the conventional orientation one typically sees in most cases. This is a good location as this is where most chassis fans end up getting routed.

The PCB layer count is ultimately unknown to me, but it feels like a 4-layer PCB. For PCIe 4.0, manufacturers have the option to either use newer materials and fewer layers or more conventional materials and higher layer counts. Six being the minimum I believe. PCIe 4.0 works here, but the motherboard feels rather flimsy. This isn’t uncommon in the price point, so I give MSI a pass here. You will need to be a bit more careful than you would with a thicker or armored PCB as you get on higher-end offerings.

Power Delivery

Power delivery or the VRM implementation is the literal elephant in the room when it comes to the MSI X570-A PRO.

The MSI X570-A PRO utilizes an Infineon IR35201 8-phase voltage controller in a 4+2 phase mode. It also uses IR3598 phase doublers. It is essentially a 6 phase design that’s taken to a 4+4+2 phase configuration via the use of doublers. ONSemi 4C029N 46A MOSFETs are used for vCore. The SoC MOSFETs are QA3111N6N from UBIQ, which are rated for 59A. This brings our total vCore power output to 368w, theoretical. While technically enough power to push a 3950X, even overclocked, you would be running the VRM’s hard enough that the cooling for the VRM’s will become inadequate. Indeed, I’ve seen some data to that effect.

However, our testing utilized a 3900X, not the 3950X. As a result, we weren’t pulling quite that much power. That said, we did see temperatures of 115c or 239F. I never saw any signs of throttling, as you’ll see from the benchmarks. But, the test environment was literally the best-case scenario for this board. In a chassis, it would likely be far worse, and hitting 125c or exceeding it would certainly become possible, even on a 3900X.

It is my opinion that this VRM is not recommended for 12c and 16c CPUs without some form of good case cooling or airflow in this area. Partly, this comes down to the selection of components used in the VRM implementation but it also comes down to the VRM cooling itself. The heat sinks are anemic. They are mounted with screws but have a bushing of sorts around them allowing for a great deal of movement. They do not make the best contact.

I haven’t pulled them so I can’t see whether or not the thermal interface for the heat sinks is decent or not. Regardless, airflow over these heat sinks is absolutely essential for operation. I tested the MSI X570-A PRO on an open-air test bench with a 120mm fan for VRM cooling. Without that, my temperatures would have been far worse.

Again, looking at what the solution is rated for, these VRM’s have to be run uncomfortably close to their maximum output in order to handle something like a 3950X or even a 3900X that’s overclocked. This is likely going to be the case with the 5900X and 5950X as well. I don’t think very many people that buy $139 motherboards buy $800 CPU’s, but you never know.

I personally would limit the use of this motherboard to at the most, a 12c CPU being run at stock speeds. It’s also worth noting that this motherboard is probably better for those using air cooling as you will have less overall airflow over the motherboard utilizing watercooling. Of course, your mileage may vary base on chassis design.

Furthermore, this motherboard was bought by another reviewer here and used for a while with a 3950X. He was kind enough to take and provide thermal images of the VRM’s when in operation. It doesn’t look good. The VRM temperatures shown are at 117c and 114c. This is in line with what I saw on my test bench, albeit with active air cooling over the VRM and a 3900X overclocked to 4.2GHz all core at 1.385v. Anyone needing 1.4v will likely see even worse results.

The VRMs: Good or Bad?

So, what does this all mean? Is the VRM implementation on the MSI X570-A PRO bad? I don’t think it’s of necessarily poor quality, however, it may be inadequate for use cases where overclocked 12 and 16 core CPUs would be used. But is it bad? Yes, and no. It isn’t made with shoddy components, nor is it somehow unreliable electrically speaking. However, the cooling is inadequate in some scenarios and configurations when compared to its peers in the same price range.

I won’t pretend to know all of the possible motherboard VRM implementations out there. However, when compared to other motherboards from other brands in the same tier, most use MOSFETs that are rated for 55A or more. Others may be rated for 46A as these are, but more phases are in use. Thus, those VRM implementations won’t have to be run as hard and probably don’t look like an episode of Forged in Fire under a thermal camera.

I hesitate to call the VRM “bad”. I think it’s fair to say that it is certainly a weak point of the MSI X570-A PRO as designed. However, it doesn’t necessarily make this motherboard a bad choice.

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. Thanks Dan for the great review! Pair this MB with a 5600X for a cheap solution that’ll be more than enough for gaming needs.
  2. This board screams “putz with the VRM cooling” based on the review. I wonder if you could just remount the heat sinks for improved performance? If not that, I have plenty of old pentium 2 slot 1 heat sinks laying around. Wonder if you could just slap one of those on for a big increase in cooling.
  3. I’ve got one of these in my main desktop with a 3900x and never really had an issue… I was looking for a motherboard without all the RGB/wifi/1337 gamer nonsense and with 2x nvme slots and this was good enough… my case (corsair D4000) has good airflow though so that may be why I’ve never noticed an issue
  4. This board screams “putz with the VRM cooling” based on the review. I wonder if you could just remount the heat sinks for improved performance? If not that, I have plenty of old pentium 2 slot 1 heat sinks laying around. Wonder if you could just slap one of those on for a big increase in cooling.

    I might be able to remount the heat sinks and get some improvement, but frankly the issue isn’t so much a heat sink issue as its a design issue. This board simply has fewer phases and fewer MOSFETs, chokes etc. than other boards in the segment. The MSI X570-A PRO has the most anemic VRM implementation of any X570 board that I know of.

    Also, those older heat sinks probably aren’t as good as you might think. Even if they were, the heat sinks have to be designed, machined and shaped to fit the specific VRM implementation in question.

    I’ve got one of these in my main desktop with a 3900x and never really had an issue… I was looking for a motherboard without all the RGB/wifi/1337 gamer nonsense and with 2x nvme slots and this was good enough… my case (corsair D4000) has good airflow though so that may be why I’ve never noticed an issue

    I didn’t have any issues either. The only issue is that the motherboard runs hot. Way too hot for use with 12 core and 16 core CPU’s in my opinion. This is especially true when overclocking. The 115c-117c temperatures David and I encountered are actually best case scenarios for this motherboard using a 12c or 16c CPU. Other reviewers reported crossing the 120c barrier and at 125c, you end up with throttling. That robs your system of performance you paid for. This is not a good motherboard for such CPU’s.

    Not encountering an obvious problem doesn’t preclude the possibility that this happens to any given system from time to time. I’d monitor those VRM temperatures and make sure that this doesn’t happen.

    As I said in the article, I think this motherboard is perfectly fine for 8 and 6 core CPU’s. Even with heavy usage or overclocking, I think it will be fine. I wouldn’t recommend this motherboard regardless. I wouldn’t pay for VRM’s this limiting or this anemic. It’s a shame given the board’s otherwise stellar performance.

  5. Wow, this is gotta be the first time I’ve ever a review of what seems like a nice MB from a reputable vendor NOT quite recommended.
  6. I might be able to remount the heat sinks and get some improvement, but frankly the issue isn’t so much a heat sink issue as its a design issue. This board simply has fewer phases and fewer MOSFETs, chokes etc. than other boards in the segment. The MSI X570-A PRO has the most anemic VRM implementation of any X570 board that I know of.

    Also, those older heat sinks probably aren’t as good as you might think. Even if they were, the heat sinks have to be designed, machined and shaped to fit the specific VRM implementation in question.

    Are the VRMs not the same Z height?

  7. The MSI X570-A PRO has the most anemic VRM implementation of any X570 board that I know of.

    Dont the MSI X570 GAMING PLUS and X570 GAMING EDGE boards use the exact same VRM implementation just with a bigger heatsink? And I think the ASUS Prime X570-P uses a very similar VRM implementation also

    Not encountering an obvious problem doesn’t preclude the possibility that this happens to any given system from time to time. I’d monitor those VRM temperatures and make sure that this doesn’t happen.

    Sure, but in my usage (stock clocks, gaming and running a bunch of VMs when I’m working on stuff) I’ve never seen them exceed 100c… like I said though I have a good case with good airflow… if you want to overclock and for just general "enthusiast" requirements it’s inadequate (although really why are you buying a $130 motherboard if you want to overclock) but as just a "whatever it works" computer it’s fine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Leave a comment