Gameplay Performance at 1440p with Ray Tracing
We are going to focus on 1440p gameplay performance with Ray Tracing on the Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition video card on this page. 1080p will be tested on the next page. We will include XeSS, FSR, and DLSS performance on the same graph in the games that are supported. For video card comparisons we are using an EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC BLACK GAMING, MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT GAMING X, and SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6600 GAMING.
Forspoken
Forspoken was released on January 24th, 2023, on the PC and uses the Luminous Engine. The game supports all upscaling methods, including NVIDIA DLSS, AMD FSR, and Intel XeSS, and Ray Tracing. We are going to customize the settings and enable the highest graphics settings, including Ultra High Texture Memory. We are going to enable both Ray Tracing options, Shadows, and Ambient Occlusion. We use the built-in benchmark.
To be clear, we are not expecting the greatest performance or playable gameplay experience at 1440p with Ray Tracing on these video cards, but we wanted to include this test to really push them all, and test them thoroughly. Perhaps with upscaling, some of the games might be possible, we will see.
In Forspoken, this game is incredibly demanding at 1440p once we turn on Ray Tracing and the highest game options. The Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition is not playable, even with upscaling XeSS. However, what is still impressive is that it is beating the performance of even the GeForce RTX 3060 here, of which the RTX series is known for its great Ray Tracing performance. The Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition is 17% faster than the GeForce RTX 3060 with Ray Tracing turned on. With Intel XeSS upscaling, performance is identical to the RTX 3060 with DLSS, which is pretty competitive. The two Radeon cards are completely bottlenecked in this game with Ray Tracing.
F1 2022
F1 2022 was released on June 28th, 2022 on the PC and uses Codemasters Ego engine. The game supports Ray Tracing, DLSS, AMD FidelityFX, and FSR. We are going to run the game with the highest quality settings of “Ultra High” and TAA+FidelityFX. We will enable all Ray Tracing options in the game to “On.” We will enable DLSS and FSR as needed at the Quality setting for both. We will utilize the built-in benchmark in the Imola track, in dry conditions with a far chasing cam.
In F1 2022, at 1440p with maximum Ray Tracing we also see that this game is not playable on any video card here until we enable upscaling technologies. The Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition is performing better than the Radeon RX 6600 XT with Ray Tracing, but the GeForce RTX 3060 does edge it out slightly. The Intel Arc A770 is 18% faster than the Radeon RX 6600 XT but 8% slower than the GeForce RTX 3060. Now once we enable upscaling, the Arc A770, RTX 3060 and RX 6600 XT are all playable at 60FPS, which is pretty important. The Intel Arc A770 can deliver a playable Ray Tracing experience in this game at 1440p with FSR.
Dying Light 2
Dying Light 2 was released in February 2022 on the PC and uses Techland’s C-Engine. We have updated the game to patch 1.90. The game supports Ray Tracing, DLSS, and FSR2. This game supports Ray Tracing environmental effects including Ray Traced Soft Shadows, Ray Traced Ambient Occlusion, Ray Traced Global Illumination, and Ray Traced Reflections. We utilize the built-in preset option to set “HIGH-QUALITY RAYTRACING” which enables the game’s highest graphics settings plus the environmental effects explained above at the highest values. The game is run in DX12 Ultimate mode with ASYNC Compute turned on. We use the built-in benchmark.
Dying Light 2 is incredibly demanding, and with Ray Tracing at 1440p none of the video cards are playable. Even with upscaling, the game struggles, except for maybe the Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition which honestly does really good compared to the competition with Intel XeSS upscaling. In performance, the Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition is 16% faster than the GeForce RTX 3060, which once again is very surprising. It’s also a big 50% faster than the Radeon RX 6600 XT, so that’s huge. When we enable Intel XeSS in this game performance jumps up another 58% to now 50FPS, which is very decent considering the resolution and Ray Tracing. With Intel XeSS the Arc A770 is 14% faster than the RTX 3060 with DLSS.
Far Cry 6
Far Cry 6 was released in October of 2021 and uses the Dunia Engine. We utilize the built-in benchmark for testing. We have the HD Texture pack installed and turned on. We utilize the “Ultra” graphics preset which sets all options to the highest game settings. This game supports Ray Tracing via two DXR settings, one for Reflections and the other for Shadows, we turn on both for testing. This game supports FSR upscaling.
Far Cry 6 is actually playable on the Intel Arc A770 with DXR enabled at 1440p without the need for upscaling. We are getting 71FPS at 1440p with DXR Ray Tracing enabled! What’s even more exciting, is that once again the Arc A770 is faster than the RTX 3060 by 15%, and 42% faster than the Radeon RX 6600 XT. FSR does help performance even more and brings it up to over 80FPS at 1440p with Ray Tracing in FC6.
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 was released in December of 2020 and uses the REDengine 4. We have the game patched to version 1.61 and use the built-in benchmark. We test using the Graphics Preset option to set graphics settings. We use the Ray Tracing Graphics Preset of either: “Ray Tracing: Low”, or “Ray Tracing: Medium” or “Ray Tracing: Ultra” as indicated. This game supports DLSS and FSR2.
As we expected in Cyberpunk 2077, this game is unplayable at 1440p with “Ultra” Ray Tracing. But once again, what is really exciting is that the Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition is on par with the GeForce RTX 3060 using Ray Tracing! Unfortunately, even with FSR2 performance isn’t good enough to be playable, but it does match the RTX 3060 with DLSS.
Watch Dogs Legion
Watch Dogs Legion was released on the PC in October of 2020 and uses the Disrupt game engine. We utilize the built-in benchmark for testing. We have the HD Texture pack installed and enabled for testing. We use the built-in graphics preset of “Ultra” for testing. We utilize the “Ultra” preset quality option for Ray Tracing. This game supports DLSS upscaling.
Watch Dogs Legion is unplayable at 1440p with Ray Tracing, but we do see the Intel Arc A770 edge out the RTX 3060 by 18%. The two Radeon cards are bottlenecked with Ray Tracing.
Metro Exodus Enhanced
Metro Exodus Enhanced is being run with Shading Quality at “Extreme” and Ray Tracing at “Ultra.” This is a demanding game, that heavily focuses on Ray Tracing utilization, including Global Illumination. We are utilizing the built-in benchmark.
Metro Exodus Enhanced is a particularly important game to test Ray Tracing performance with. This game uses a robust implementation of Ray Tracing, including Global Illumination. This is a good representation of which video cards are best at Ray Tracing as a technical feature. The Intel Arc A770 Limited Edition blows the competition out of the water here, providing 62% higher Ray Tracing performance compared to the GeForce RTX 3060. This is amazing, to say the least. Compared to the Radeon RX 6600 XT it is 79% faster. This boads good things for Intel Arc Ray Tracing performance.
Discussion (16 replies)
Join Discussion →Nice review. I had no idea Intel would be able to put out something that is actually competitive, AND at a lower price point than Nvidia. And I have been reading how the drivers are improving. Let's hope they keep cracking the whip on the driver team.... there is more to life than just CS:GO and F1 numbers.
I doubt this is going to supplant my 1080ti, but for someone on a budget or building new, this is interesting. We really do NEED competition in the GPU field to get the prices down. I know it won't compare to a $800+ 4070ti, but it seems to be holding up well to the $400+ 3060.
Oh almost forgot.... does this one provide any benefit to video compression work, since it supports all the common high end codecs?
I have not personally tested video encoding, but it does famously support AV1, and according to YT videos I've watched, it's competitively fast at it.
I'm really impressed with RT performance. It absolutely crushes AMD and is very competitive with nvidia.
Thanks, @Brent_Justice for the great review. I really am bummed with how the launch of this card went because I do believe that it is a good card and deserves better. Here's hoping the next launch goes better. I've been following the stories about the driver updates and how they've helped close the FPS gap with many games and have improved overall performance.
Wow the benches are all over the place -- not necessarily a bad thing, it's a new third-party entry. Just interesting to see it doesn't boil down to the usual camps of "plays well on Green" or "plays well on Red".
Hard to really compare anything with RT - the numbers are barely playable even at best, and we are looking at only last-gen stuff from AMD/nVidia (rightfully so, neither has released anything in the lower price tiers on current-gen architectures, but those current gen things have much different RT performance). That, and... I don't really care a whole lot about RT performance in the first place.
Nice review. This entry by Intel is definitely interesting. Truth be told it's a lot more impressive than anything I expected out of them considering how new they are in this space. The gains from drivers is also impressive. When it was first released a lot of people commented that it seemed the hardware was quite good overall but the drivers were holding it back and that definitely seems to be the case in plenty of instances. While the card is far from perfect it does show that Intel has promise in the GPU space.
I'd like to get my hands on one just to mess around with it and see what it does for my uses.
[embedded media]
Wow, I was impressed the A770 pretty much keeps pace with 1080ti. Yeah I know that's old hat by now, but still an awesome card. And for under $400 is impressive.
Lol.
Is there any combination of title, resolution and settings in which this thing is fast enough to be playable, where it will actually use 16GB of VRAM?
I have to wonder why they decided to release this product instead of just the 8GB version.
That said, $349 is by far the cheapest 16GB video card I can think of, so if you have the need for a large amount of VRAM (and not much else) maybe this is your best choice?
Well, if you think about when this card was being designed - Etherium mining could use all the VRAM you could throw at it, and that was really the market Intel was planning on chasing. So... yeah, that's why.
I thought Ethereum liked more memory bandwidth than memory size.
I never mined it myself but yeah, what you say probably makes more sense - but I know there's certainly a floor for it where you have to have a minimum amount of VRAM to play.
I tinkered with mining during its peak since I had so many old cards laying around and was in the process of updating a few as well. It does like more ram but favors speed even more once you're at/over the 8GB mark. I have an EVGA RTX 2080 Super with (GDDR6) that did pretty well because of the faster ram. My older cards, the 1080s (from my last SLI setup) and 1080 Ti did ok but that Super was about 20% better than the 1080 Ti even though it had more VRAM. The cards that did the best were the 2080 Ti and a 3090 but that's not including power usage although undervolting/underclocking could do a lot to balance that.
In the end, before I stopped altogether, the optimal setup on my old X79 motherboard was using the 2080 Super, 2080 Ti, and a 3090. I have to say that the Super was an interesting beast in that while on some levels it was only just more powerful in terms of rasterization of the 1080 Ti, the tensor cores+DLSS allowed it to take a step further and that combined with the faster VRAM gave it just a bit more to boot. The other neat thing is that it only needed 2x 8-pin connectors while the 1080 Ti used 3. I originally bought that Super to use with my original 3700X build with the LG C9 since it was the only thing I could afford to be able to use the C9's 120Hz HDR g-sync, albeit at 1440p. It was also a nice BF deal in that it cost less than the 1080 Ti did at launch.
I had a GTX1070 and later a GTX1070Ti that paid themselves in just a few months with ethereum. Both mined pretty much the same, I figured it was because they had the same bandwidth.
Nicely done!
It is good to see Intel doing very well in the low/mid range gpu space. Perhaps less profit per unit, a whole lot more units sold per year though.
Once Intel is comfortable with its silicone and drivers I am hoping for them to come out swinging with a high end GPU. Looks like they will be able to compete against the raster performance of AMD and the Ray Trace/AI of NV - or so I hope.
Not this generation - I am thinking this was their test run and unofficial Beta testing. In 6-18 months I expect to see second generation Intel GPU's.
Now that Raja Koduri is gone, I don't know if even a next gen is in the works.