Aida64 Benchmarks

Aida64 Queen

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Review Aida64 CPU Queen Graph

The Aida64 Queen tests has a result of 100166 on the Ryzen 7 3700X and 94256 on the Ryzen 7 2700X.  That puts the Ryzen 7 3700X at 6% faster in the Queen test compared to the Ryzen 7 2700X.  CPU Queen focuses more on integer performance.

Aida64 FPU Mandel

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Review Aida64 FPU Mandel Graph

The Aida64 Mandel FPU test focuses more on floating-point performance.  The Ryzen 7 3700X scores 42473 while the Ryzen 7 2700X scores 21886.  That’s a whopping 94% increase in performance on the Ryzen 7 3700X.  This indicates that floating-point performance has been increased greatly from Zen 2 compared to the Zen architecture.  Also, the inclusion of twice the amount of L3 cache on the Ryzen 7 3700X also helps out a lot.

Aida64 Memory Read

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Review Aida64 Memory Read Graph

The memory read performance is pretty much identical between the two CPUs delivering 50-51GB/s of memory read bandwidth.

Aida64 Memory Write

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Review Aida64 Memory Write Graph

You will notice that the performance is very different for the memory write performance.  Ryzen 7 3700X actually writes at a lesser performance of 28GB/s, while Ryzen 7 2700X can write at 48GB/s. 

The reason for this is down to the chiplet layout on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus the monolithic layout on the Ryzen 7 2700X.  The CCD/IOD link is 16B/cycle for writing on the Ryzen 7 3700X to save power and area inside the package per CCD.  Whereas, with the Ryzen 7 2700X monolithic design it’s 32B/cycle because it’s all one die, no separate CCDs.  You can read more about it here.  This doesn’t actually harm performance though in real-world applications as has been shown so far and you will continue to see.

Aida64 GPGPU CPU Only

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Review Aida64 GPGPU CPU Table Comparison

In the above picture you will see a comparison running the GPGPU benchmark in CPU mode only between the 2700X and 3700X in Aida64.  This lets you compare several values like single-precision and double-precision FLOPS, AES-256 encryption, SHA-1 Hash and Single and Double Precision Julia and Mandel.  You can see where the Ryzen 7 3700X really shines.

Recent Posts

Brent Justice

Brent Justice has been reviewing computer components for 20+ years, educated in the art and method of the computer hardware review he brings experience, knowledge, and hands-on testing with a gamer oriented...

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. Interesting analysis, great seeing an actual tangible progression from AMD. We knew this but this is much better data points since now both CPUs are mature with software and hardware, great stuff. I can see you doing this again hopefully next year with the 4070x or whatever the 8core/16 thread part is from AMD.

    I was surprised you were able to get 3600mhz out of the 2700x, my 2700 gets 3466mhz out of the B450 MSI board but nothing close to 3600mhz with Samsung B Die modules. X570 memory tracing that much better is my guess.

    The 3700x is really an outstanding deal for the $, then again with Zen 3 coming not too long from now one can only wonder what that can bring. May have to do the full progression model, Zen 1, Zen+, Zen2 and Zen3. Compared to Intel, I can’t even remember all the lakes now which all tend to blend together with virtually the same performance overall.

  2. That is why we really wanted to use the X570 chipset for the review, it’s a unique perspective and gives the 2700X the best chance possible.
  3. Very interesting! I’m sitting on a X470 chipset and am planning on upgrading just the CPU with zen 3 – straight jump to the 4950X (or whatever they call 16 core 32 thread part). I didn’t think chipset would really hold me back at all, but maybe I need to reconsider. Wonder how they 3700X would do on x470
  4. I didn’t think chipset would really hold me back at all, but maybe I need to reconsider. Wonder how they 3700X would do on x470

    Per AMD, there are no performance differences between the various chipsets that are out there. The differences are related to feature set and number/type of pci-e lanes.

  5. Per AMD, there are no performance differences between the various chipsets that are out there. The differences are related to feature set and number/type of pci-e lanes.

    Other than having a better VRM design or more BIOS options, the X470 would perform the same here.

  6. Where are the Hunt:Showdown Comparisons?!!!!! :cry: :p

    Another great write up. I’m glad I upgraded to the 3700x from my 2700x. Aside from the performance increase ..one of the biggest gains/advantages I got from the upgrade was memory compatibility. From only being able to run 4 x 8gb 3200mhz sticks at 2933mhz with the 2700x to running the same memory at it rated speed using XMP profile.
    I experienced that across the board going from 2000 series to 3000 series .. 1 2200g couldn’t run 2 x 16gb 3000mhz stable (2866mhz stable) switching to 3600x same memory can run 3200mhz .. another 2200g couldn’t run stable at all with 4 sticks installed, switching to 3400g, can now run same 4 sticks at rated 3200mhz (XMP profile) ..

    I now run 2 x 16gb 3200mhz stuff on my x570 Steel Legend at 3800mhz (Hynix chips CAS18 1.41v)with fclk on my 3700x at 1900(1:1) with just PBO enabled and no other voltage increases with the CPU.

    Thanks for putting this up! :cool:

  7. Other than having a better VRM design or more BIOS options, the X470 would perform the same here.

    So the 2700X should be able to hit 3600 on the memory on a X470 board too? Not that I’m going to rebuy my 32gb of 3200, but I’m curious if I should have gone with faster ram.

  8. So the 2700X should be able to hit 3600 on the memory on a X470 board too? Not that I’m going to rebuy my 32gb of 3200, but I’m curious if I should have gone with faster ram.

    When I say that performance is the same between the chipsets, I mean given all things being equal. The Ryzen 7 2700X is incapable of achieving higher memory speeds on the X470 chipset. I don’t know that it would do so on an X570 board either. I haven’t tested that.

  9. I just made this upgrade a week ago. With the prices dropping so low, I was thinking this should keep me going a bit longer without going to a new MB. It is a smooth running CPU. I have been playing Modern Warfare multiplayer lately and it does seem a bit smoother overall. Is it just my imagination? Hard to say, but it sure feels like it. I am running a 1080ti with a 27in 1440p g-sync monitor.
  10. Thanks for the comparison review. I always find these reviews extremely interesting but don’t see them often.

    This should give you some really nice baseline info when the 4xxx series processors release to see how they all compare against each other. I look forward to seeing all of it together when that comes to pass.

  11. Very timely comparison, because I have been wondering if I should have dropped a Zen 2 CPU into my dev box to replace the 2700X. Your testing justified my inaction, particularly given that the money tree has flowered only weakly this year! Keep up the good work.
Leave a comment