MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X 24G Video Card Review

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

MSI RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X banner image

Introduction

On our test bench, today is the MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X 24G video card. It sits at the top of MSI’s 4090 product stack and has the same boost clocks as its air-cooled sister card. The key features of the MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X 24G is the high factory overclock (105MHz boost clock increase), a 480W power limit, and a 240mm AIO cooling solution.

The RTX 40 Series GPUs have been a bit easier to find in the retail environment compared to the 30 Series, though the RTX 4090-based cards tend to not stay in stock for a long time when they do pop up. The MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X 24G rings in at an MSRP of $1749, which is a $150 premium over the GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition.

The RTX 4090 GPU is based on the TSMC 4N manufacturing process, and Lovelace architecture.  It has 128 SMs, 16,384 CUDA Cores, 512 Tensor Cores (4th gen), 128 RT Cores (3rd gen), 512 Texture Units, and 176 ROPs.  It has a GPU Boost Clock of 2520MHz.  It has 24GB of GDDR6X memory at 21GHz on a 384-bit bus providing 1008GB/s of memory bandwidth.

MSI RTX 4090 Models

MSI has eight RTX 4090 models listed on its website which are segmented into SUPRIM, GAMING, and VENTUS product lines. Each of the product lines has a lower clocked and a higher clocked variant, with X denoting a faster SUPRIM or GAMING card whereas VENTUS uses OC. A liquid-cooled variant is only available under the SUPRIM barrier, and keep in mind that there is a LIQUID and LIQUID X variant of this card, with the latter being clocked higher and the one we are reviewing today.

MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X 24G

The MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X 24G comes in a whale of a box as there’s got to be somewhere to hide the 240mm AIO cooler. Once we cracked open the box, we found all the goodies necessary to get going, including a SUPRIM-branded mousepad.

Specifications

MSI has given the RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X 24G a factory overclock of 105MHz on the boost clock, bringing it from the stock 2520MHz up to 2625MHz. Keep in mind that the boost clock is a target based on power, workload, and temperature and that value will typically be exceeded via the card’s boosting algorithm. It also has an Extreme Performance mode bringing it up to a 2640MHz boost clock via MSI Center. It also sports 24GB of 21GHz GDDR6X memory which is equal in speed to the reference specifications. MSI quotes power consumption at 480W TGP, which is 30W higher than the Founders Edition 450W TGP level. The video card supports a dual-BIOS for Silent and Gaming modes. A minimum 850W PSU is needed, and MSI recommends 1000W.

From a size perspective, it’s still a rather large card, but slim enough to fit in a two-slot profile. It’s tall and long, still hanging over the back of our test bench’s full-size ATX motherboard. Specifically, it is 11 inches long, 5.5 inches tall, and 1.7 inches wide and weighs in at 5.187 pounds. Of note, this is a significantly smaller footprint than what you see from other RTX 4090-based cards. This video card supports 3x DisplayPort 1.4a ports, and 1x HDMI 2.1a port.

Cooling Solution Overview

MSI’s cooling setup rests on three main features: Zero Frozr, TORX FAN 5.0, a micro-fin copper waterblock, and a 240mm aluminum heat radiator. The radiator is equipped with MSI’s MEG SILENT GALE P12 fan that features anti-vibration gaskets on its corners to reduce vibration (Ed: That’s obviously obvious!).  A metal backplate is also installed to help move the back side’s heat around.

Join the discussion in The FPS Review Forums...

REVIEW OVERVIEW

Gaming Performance
10
Overclocking
9
Build Quality and Cooling
10
Price and Value
8

SUMMARY

This review evaluated the MSI GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM LIQUID X 24G video card. It is a factory-overclocked RTX 4090 that uses an all-in-one water cooling setup to keep its cool during long gaming sessions. We compared it to the GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX and found that it outperformed both of them and brought a true 4K with Ray Tracing experience to our entire test suite. It is the fastest RTX 4090 class card we've had on our test bench and a great buy if you're looking for the best money can buy.

Discussion (19 replies)

Join Discussion →
Grimlakin
Grimlakin

That is the 4090 that is the MOST tempting to get.

Brent_Justice
Brent_Justice

"Grimlakin, post: 68583, member: 215" wrote:

That is the 4090 that is the MOST tempting to get.


I agree

Peter_Brosdahl
Peter_Brosdahl 👍 1

Thanks, @David_Schroth for the great review. Any plans to test DLSS 3 aka frame generation? I've recently been testing CB2077 and Hogwarts with it and then turning DLSS AA off.

I cannot even begin to say how much I love mine. Quiet, powerful, and just gets the job done. I've been dreaming of AIO graphics cards for years and am so happy to finally be lucky enough to have them. I'm also truly shocked at how well this setup works with a mere 240mm solution as well. I wouldn't have thought it possible if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes.

Following your advice, I did some voltage tweaking and was able to get to a completely stable 2910-2955 MHz, 23.2 GHz mem. I think I lost out a bit on the silicon lottery as even though I can get it a bit higher, it's just not stable 24/7 at that point. I have even been using the stock fan curves (but do max for benching and testing) while gaming with the OC settings and rarely see it go above 64c inside the Carbide. With the fans maxed it hangs in the low 50s after putting it through the rounds for a couple of hours. I did a timespy run last night with my current OC settings and got 28,651. I'm sure with that 24 GHz and higher clock you might even break 30,000, In terms of power usage I'm seeing the exact same behavior.

It's also hilarious to see the boost clock jump up to over 2800 Mhz simply by increasing the power or voltage.

D
David_Schroth 👍 1

"Peter_Brosdahl, post: 68594, member: 87" wrote:

Any plans to test DLSS 3 aka frame generation? I've recently been testing CB2077 and Hogwarts with it and then turning DLSS AA off.


I think Brent commented on it in one of the 40 series articles that he's done. I haven't had a chance to tinker with it myself - I've got a couple other reviews to knock out in the pipeline at the moment in other departments...

h

Is the copper water block plated? Copper block + aluminum radiator is not a good combination.

Peter_Brosdahl
Peter_Brosdahl 👍 1

"hubaduba, post: 68634, member: 1423" wrote:

Is the copper water block plated? Copper block + aluminum radiator is not a good combination.


I checked the website and yeah. I'm totally aware of what you probably mean, galvanic corrosion and the things associated with it. We'll see, maybe there's something magic in the fluid to prevent, and minimize it for the long term. I expect mine to get a lot of hours and use it for years to come so I'll speak up if I see anything. I've also got a 3090 Ti Hybrid that I'm pretty sure is the same that's about 6-months older than this. I know there are nightmare scenarios but after reading some newer posts across the internet it's not always a worst-case scenario either.

S
Stoly 👍 1

"Grimlakin, post: 68583, member: 215" wrote:

That is the 4090 that is the MOST tempting to get.


If I could afford one, this is the one I would get.

I'm currently on a RTX 3070Ti, but I got a raise recently, maybe I could get a RTX 4070Ti.

Peter_Brosdahl
Peter_Brosdahl

"Stoly, post: 68655, member: 1474" wrote:

If I could afford one, this is the one I would get.



I'm currently on a RTX 3070Ti, but I got a raise recently, maybe I could get a RTX 4070Ti.


At this point, I'm getting nervous about NV's generational improvements. As much as I truly love having this card I'm extremely annoyed that we're starting to see a kind of every other gen hardware addition to their cards in order to use a new feature (i.e. 20-series for RT and Tensor cores, 40-series for DLSS3-frame gen), and now there was that story yesterday about RT overdrive in CB 2077. Odds are this series will support it but I wouldn't put it past them to add yet something else for whatever comes next. I'm all for more hardware being added to cards but it's beginning to feel less innovated and more staged/scheduled for max profits.

It's a foil hat theory for sure but I'm it does seem a bit different than the 20-30% perf increase per gen we were seeing from the 700 series to the 20 series. I'm all for more hardware being added to cards. We've known for decades that a single GPU was becoming overwhelmed with everything being thrown at it and mGPU/SLI/Crossfire had its issues so whether by chiplets or designated cores, it was obvious something needed to be done to offload some of that work but I'm not into a model of piecemealing one thing at a time every other gen. It's well known that in big industry you have multiple pipelines of R&D and release schedules planned out but I have doubts about how necessary it would be to roll out a new hardware addon in this fashion. I hope I'm wrong.

B
Burticus 👍 3

$1750 o_O

That is used Honda Civic territory

Peter_Brosdahl
Peter_Brosdahl 👍 2

"Burticus, post: 68691, member: 297" wrote:

$1750 o_O



That is used Honda Civic territory


haha. That used to be true but in my neck of the woods, that's now the down payment. I could definitely derail this thread but used cars out here are not happening for under $2K unless they have over 200K on them. Although I hear rumors the used car market is supposedly dropping again I'll believe it when I see it. Meanwhile, we're schlepping along in an '09 forester (142K) and '02 Grand Caravan (165K) and I'm looking to get a replacement for the van this summer. It's one of the reasons I opted to revive my 3700X build instead of doing the 7000X3D build I was considering for a while.

S
SmokeRngs

"Peter_Brosdahl, post: 68674, member: 87" wrote:

At this point, I'm getting nervous about NV's generational improvements. As much as I truly love having this card I'm extremely annoyed that we're starting to see a kind of every other gen hardware addition to their cards in order to use a new feature (i.e. 20-series for RT and Tensor cores, 40-series for DLSS3-frame gen), and now there was that story yesterday about RT overdrive in CB 2077. Odds are this series will support it but I wouldn't put it past them to add yet something else for whatever comes next. I'm all for more hardware being added to cards but it's beginning to feel less innovated and more staged/scheduled for max profits.



It's a foil hat theory for sure but I'm it does seem a bit different than the 20-30% perf increase per gen we were seeing from the 700 series to the 20 series. I'm all for more hardware being added to cards. We've known for decades that a single GPU was becoming overwhelmed with everything being thrown at it and mGPU/SLI/Crossfire had its issues so whether by chiplets or designated cores, it was obvious something needed to be done to offload some of that work but I'm not into a model of piecemealing one thing at a time every other gen. It's well known that in big industry you have multiple pipelines of R&D and release schedules planned out but I have doubts about how necessary it would be to roll out a new hardware addon in this fashion. I hope I'm wrong.


It's not tinfoil hat theory at all because there's an obvious pattern and nVidia does not like supporting or updating anything for cards more than a generation old. In many cases there's little or no reason for that support to be basically dropped. AMD has been managing to do very similar if not the same things with support not only for older AMD cards but most current and older nVidia cards as well as Intel's new cards. FSR has proven that. nVidia is obviously using specialized and nVidia dedicated hardware to do some of these things but that doesn't mean it must be done that way with cutting off support except for the absolute latest cards. nVidia stinks of planned and unneeded obsolescence with the goal being to force new hardware purchases and force people into a specific locked down ecosystem.

Grimlakin
Grimlakin 👍 1

"SmokeRngs, post: 68726, member: 117" wrote:

It's not tinfoil hat theory at all because there's an obvious pattern and nVidia does not like supporting or updating anything for cards more than a generation old. In many cases there's little or no reason for that support to be basically dropped. AMD has been managing to do very similar if not the same things with support not only for older AMD cards but most current and older nVidia cards as well as Intel's new cards. FSR has proven that. nVidia is obviously using specialized and nVidia dedicated hardware to do some of these things but that doesn't mean it must be done that way with cutting off support except for the absolute latest cards. nVidia stinks of planned and unneeded obsolescence with the goal being to force new hardware purchases and force people into a specific locked down ecosystem.


To think a company that bought 3dfx just to get the tech and then dissolved the company in an accessive manner would treat it's non business customers any other way.

They have used their influence and position in the market to abuse it's customers long enough that the bruises haven't even faded before they go for new ones. It's a reason AMD is successful in the video card market.

S

"Grimlakin, post: 68740, member: 215" wrote:

To think a company that bought 3dfx just to get the tech and then dissolved the company in an accessive manner would treat it's non business customers any other way.



They have used their influence and position in the market to abuse it's customers long enough that the bruises haven't even faded before they go for new ones. It's a reason AMD is successful in the video card market.


Make that patents, not technology. I had the chance to ask Tom Petersen when he was still with nvidia what technologies from 3dfx made it to nvidia back in the day. He said that by that time nvidia was already way beyond 3dfx technology wise so very little if anything made it into nvidia products other than SLi and that's only in the name.

B
Burticus 👍 1

"Grimlakin, post: 68740, member: 215" wrote:

To think a company that bought 3dfx just to get the tech and then dissolved the company in an accessive manner would treat it's non business customers any other way.



They have used their influence and position in the market to abuse it's customers long enough that the bruises haven't even faded before they go for new ones. It's a reason AMD is successful in the video card market.

I think that was mostly to squash a competitor. And for 3dfx's brass to cash out before the company went totally bankrupt.

That was a sad time, and I knew people that worked there. That was a mgmt c*ckup for the record books... right up there with Commodore.

Grimlakin
Grimlakin 👍 3

"Burticus, post: 68759, member: 297" wrote:

I think that was mostly to squash a competitor. And for 3dfx's brass to cash out before the company went totally bankrupt.



That was a sad time, and I knew people that worked there. That was a mgmt c*ckup for the record books... right up there with Commodore.


Fair, they were a local company for me too. Wouldn't have minded working for them but they didn't need sysadmins at the time.

though I did run a pair of I believe Voodoo II cards.

David Schroth
David is a computer hardware enthusiast that has been tinkering with computer hardware for the past 25 years and writing reviews for more than ten years. He's the Founder and Editor in Chief of The FPS Review.

Recent News