
Introduction
It has been five and a half months since AMD launched its brand new Radeon RX 7000 series GPUs based on the new RDNA 3 architecture. In December of 2022, AMD released both the enthusiast high-end Radeon RX 7900 XTX and Radeon RX 7900 XT. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX has an MSRP of $999 and the Radeon RX 7900 XT has an MSRP of $899. It has taken AMD almost six whole months to finally give us another addition to the Radeon RX 7000 series family, and it is just one GPU launching today. This time, AMD is giving us the entire opposite end of the spectrum, and going mainstream by adding the new Radeon RX 7600 to the RDNA 3 lineup.
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is aimed at the 1080p gameplay experience, mainstream market segment, and will have an exciting MSRP of just $269. It seems AMD is hitting the spectrum at both ends, by first releasing its top-end product, and now its lowest-end product. That does, however, leave a lot of room in the middle that we hope AMD fills in quickly this summer. Let’s talk about the new Radeon RX 7600.
As we mentioned, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 will have a suggested retail price set at $269. AMD will offer a made-by-AMD model, and that is the model we are reviewing today. There will also be AIB custom card designs available on May 25th, 2023. You can probably expect models with factory overclocks, and price premiums. Thankfully AMD is pricing the Radeon RX 7600 well under $300, and this means it provides some interesting price to performance metrics.
If you look at AMD’s last generation video card in this segment, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, it launched at the end of 2021 at an MSRP of $329. It was refreshed in the Spring 2022 refresh by the Radeon RX 6650 XT at a $399 MSRP. Therefore, the new Radeon RX 7600 as an upgrade from the Radeon RX 6600 is happening at a suggested retail price that is 18% ($60) below the previous generation! A potentially faster video card is being offered, at a reduced MSRP versus the previous generation! It’s almost unheard of these days but extremely welcomed. Therefore we will have to put the Radeon RX 7600 to the test at 1080p, with Ray Tracing and FSR to see how it stacks up.
AMD Radeon RX 7600 Specifications




Let’s start with the basics, the new Radeon RX 7600 is based on the newest RDNA 3 architecture, the same as the Radeon RX 7900 XTX and 7900 XT. You can read about that architecture here where we have laid out all the specifics. The Radeon RX 7600 at $269 is aimed squarely at the 1080p gaming space. For this price point, that makes sense. As AMD shows, the Radeon RX 7600 occupies the mainstream segment, while the previous generation RDNA 2 GPUs occupy the middle segments until you get to ultra-enthusiast with the RX 7900 XTX and 7900 XT. Hopefully, AMD will fill in the enthusiast and premium segments with RDNA 3 GPUs soon, we cannot rely on the previous generation forever.








The newly released NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is not the price competitor, or performance competitor, to the new AMD Radeon RX 7600. The two video cards operate at two separate price and performance segments. Therefore while these two video cards are being released at the same time here in May 2023, they are not directly price or performance comparable. We just wanted to mention that, because the comparison cards appropriate for the Radeon RX 7600 are different than the cards that compare to the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti.


AMD Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured on TSMC 6nm and is the NAVI 33XL GPU. It has 32 Compute Units, 32 Ray Accelerators, 64 AI Accelerators, 64 ROPs, and 2,048 Stream Processors. It has 32MB of 2nd Gen AMD Infinity Cache. The Game GPU Clock is 2250MHz and the Boost GPU Clock can go up to 2625MHz. It has 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM capacity at 18GHz on a 128-bit memory bus providing 288GB/s of actual memory bandwidth. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 lanes interface. The Total Board Power is 165W. AMD recommends a 550W power supply.
For some comparison, the Radeon RX 6600 also had 8GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit memory bus, but it ran at 14GHz with 224GB/s of actual memory bandwidth. Therefore, on the memory subsystem, the new Radeon RX 7600 gets an upgrade in memory frequency to 18GHz, meaning higher memory bandwidth at 288GB/s. The Radeon RX 6600 also had 32MB of Infinity Cache, but it was 1st Gen, not 2nd Gen.



The Radeon RX 6600 had fewer Stream Processors with 1,792 versus 2,048 on the RX 7600. The Radeon RX 6600 had a lower Game GPU Clock of 2044MHz and Boost GPU Clock of 2491MHz. Therefore the Radeon RX 7600 provides an upgrade in a better manufacturing node of 6nm versus 7nm on RX 6600, a higher transistor count of 13.3 billion versus 11.1 billion on RX 6600, and yet a smaller Die Size of 204mm2 versus 237mm2 on RX 6600. The Radeon RX 7600 has a new architecture based on RDNA 3, more Stream Processors, higher GPU clocks, new AI Accelerators, and faster VRAM with higher bandwidth. The Total Board Power did increase from 132W on the Radeon RX 6600 to now 165W on the Radeon RX 7600. Both have a PCIe Gen 4 x8 PCIe Interface.
AMD Radeon RX 7600 Pictures


The built by AMD Radeon RX 7600 comes in a very compact form fact, utilizing the new shroud design implemented on the higher-end RX 7900 XTX and 7900 XT. The shroud encompasses the entire video card, wrapping around the end. There is a grill vent on the top, which can let heat escape naturally. The entire video card feels solid and well-built.




One of the greatest features of this video card is its size. The Radeon RX 7600 measures only 8.5 inches long and 1.5 inches in width, so it fits in perfectly in a 2-slot design and should fit really well in small form factor cases and small builds.








Because the AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses AMD’s new Radiance Display Engine it comes equipped with DisplayPort 2.1 support with link bandwidth up to 54Gbps. Due to the inclusion of AMD’s latest Media Engine, the video card also supports AV1 encoding. It has 3x DisplayPorts and 1x HDMI 2.1a. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 requires one single 8-pin PCIe power connector and AMD recommends a 550W power supply.

Discussion (12 replies)
Join Discussion →Performance is a bit disappointing.
I would have liked something between a 6700xt & 6750xt level.
As the 700watt 7990xtx showed, RDNA 3 can scale in frequencies given the power.
So maybe a 16gb 7600xt that matches 6750xt for $350 is possible !?
Or a 16gb 7600xt that matches 6700xt for $330 !!??
Lovely review... just making a couple notes.
1. Your math is off with this statement: "Compared to FSR performance on the previous generation RX 6600 the new RX 7700 with FSR is 20% faster." Some quick armchair excel work shows that with FSR compared to the 6600 with FSR the 7600 is actually 23.8 or roughly 24% faster. If you want me to explain my math I'd be glad to! :) Now 20% would be correct to say the 6600 with FSR is 20% slower than the 7600 with FSR. :) I know it's nitpicky... but I'm professionally nitpicky.
I'm not going to armchair math the rest of the statements... Just this one lol.
Interesting review if I were a new gamer on a budget and wanted 1080 gaming I would have no issues using this card.
If you can move the budget up by $50, then you get the 12gb 6750xt
https://www.newegg.com/msi-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x-12g-oc/p/N82E16814137735?Item=N82E16814137735
AMD fine wine effect will see ftbe 7600 exceed the 6750.
I double checked the math, FSR to FSR the math seems correct. 104-87/87*100 gives 19.5% performance advantage. Double Checking here: https://www.calculator.net/percent-calculator.html?c3par1=87&c3par2=104&ctype=3&x=43&y=15#pctdifference 104 is a 19.5% increase of 87.
NOTE: I have added a section under the Test Setup Page that clarifies a driver issue that could be skewing results between some reviewers and testing. I just wanted to make this clear, and make it clear what driver we were using, which is the correct one, with all the new performance optimizations for Radeon RX 7600.
https://www.thefpsreview.com/2023/05/24/amd-radeon-rx-7600-video-card-review/2/
This could explain some discrepancies in reviews you see around the web, so just want to put that out there for public knowledge.
In addition, we are also using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU, and remember, at 1080p, where most people are testing, it can lean on CPU performance, even on a video card at this price point. CPU can make a difference in the overall performance spread between two video cards at 1080p.
Maybe my arm chair magh was wrong. I need to revoew it again. But it was not the same method the website uses. So I'm thinking my algorithm was incorrect. Easy test if you take 87 and multiply it by 1.195 that should get you the 108. And that does work. My armchair excel was wrong because I derived off of a different equation that just felt right but was oh so wrong.
Good review but another 8gb card. Good price for today by AMD and hope to see a 16gb version less than $350. Texture resolution can have such a big impact on image quality while having almost no performance impact if you have the VRam. I hope AMD opens up for AIBs the possibility of 16gb versions.
16gb 7600 should definitely be possible, because we had 6500xt 8gb
Question is since RDNA 3 is more efficient than RDNA 2, will AMD release a higher TDP version to make it match the performance of 6700xt/6750xt ?
7900XT(X) seem to be more efficient, but that's not the impression I've gotten from 7600 reviews - it has better RT and includes AV1 encoding, but otherwise it's the same perf/watt as RDNA 2 since it's built on the old process?
7600 is 12%-33% more efficient than the 6650xt
Theoretically AMD could double TDP to match performance of 6700xt/6750xt but may not be worth jacking up the TDP so much on a low end card
https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2023-05/amd-radeon-rx-7600-test/3/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-GB#abschnitt_energieeffizienz_in_fps_pro_watt
They're going to have to do something for the real 'mid-range' cards surely. Hopefully they're close to clearing out their crypto-glut and getting new SKUs out.