AMD Radeon RX 7600 Video Card Review

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Gameplay Performance – 1080p Ray Tracing

We are going to focus on the 1080p gameplay performance with Ray Tracing with the Radeon RX 7600 on this page. We will include DLSS and FSR performance on the same graph in the games that are supported.  We will use DLSS on NVIDIA GPUs and FSR on AMD GPUs.  For video card comparisons we are using a GeForce RTX 3060 12GB and Radeon RX 6600.

Returnal

Returnal was launched on the PC in February of 2023 and is based on Unreal Engine 4. The game supports real-time ray tracing effects, particle systems, and volumetric rendering. We utilize the graphics preset to set EPIC graphics settings with an unlocked framerate, and everything is enabled. For ray tracing tests we have enabled Ray Traced Shadows and Reflections at EPIC settings. We use the built-in benchmark.

Returnal 1080p Ray Tracing Performance Graph

Now we are pushing Ray Tracing on the new Radeon RX 7600 at 1080p, to really test it out. In Returnal at 1080p with EPIC Ray Tracing the Radeon RX 7600 doesn’t really seem to offer a great playable experience, the RTX 3060 is better. However, we find there to be a generational increase in Ray Tracing performance. The new Radeon RX 7600 offers a 28% performance upgrade over the previous generation Radeon RX 6600. Therefore Ray Tracing performance has improved in this game, but we do find that the RTX 3060 12GB outperforms it at Ray Tracing by 12% in performance. FSR can add performance and make the game playable though with Ray Tracing, FSR improves performance by 51% and takes it to average 77FPS and is very playable.

Forspoken

Forspoken was released on January 24th, 2023, on the PC and uses the Luminous Engine. The game supports all upscaling methods and Ray Tracing. We are going to customize the settings and enable the highest graphics settings, including Ultra High Texture Memory. We are going to enable both Ray Tracing options, Shadows, and Ambient Occlusion. We use the built-in benchmark.

Forspoken 1080p Ray Tracing Performance Graph

In Forspoken, turning on Ray Tracing at 1080p is definitely not playable on the new Radeon RX 7600, just as it was on the Radeon RX 6600. Even turning on FSR won’t save performance here, even with FSR it is still not playable. We do see that the Radeon RX 7600 has improved in performance by 46% over the Radeon RX 6600, which is pretty large. However, the GeForce RTX 3060 12GB clearly has the performance advantage with Ray Tracing by outperforming the Radeon RX 7600 by 40%. You still need to utilize DLSS on the RTX 3060 12GB to make it playable, however, but at least you can with that card, and you just cannot on the Radeon RX 7600 in this game without lowering game settings.

The Callisto Protocol

The Callisto Protocol was released in December of 2022 on the PC and is based on Unreal Engine 4. We run the game in DX12 mode with unlimited framerate, and all graphics settings enabled and at the highest graphics settings. This game supports ray tracing, and FSR upscaling only, we use FSR2 for testing. For Ray Tracing we enable Ray Traced Shadows, Ray Traced Transmission, and Ray Traced Reflections to High. We use the built-in benchmark.

The Callisto Protocol 1080p Ray Tracing Performance Graph

In The Callisto Protocol, we have all the Ray Tracing options enabled at the highest values. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is remarkably playable at 1080p with these highest Ray Tracing settings without needing upscaling. We find that it performs 36% faster than the previous generation Radeon RX 6600, which is a nice upgrade in performance. In fact, it even beats the GeForce RTX 3060 12GB by 23% and outperforms it with playable performance. FSR adds 45% more performance and allows the game to be playable at 80FPS with Ray Tracing.

Chernobylite Enhanced Edition

Chernobylite was released on the PC in 2021, but the free Enhanced Edition update for the game was released in April 2022. The Enhanced Edition provides a visual overhaul of the game with better textures, plus introduces tessellation and ray tracing features. It features raytraced reflections, raytraced translucency, raytraced caustics, and raytraced dynamic diffuse global illumination. The game is based on Unreal Engine 4. For our Ray Tracing test, we have enabled the Ultra Ray Tracing option.

Chernobylite Enhanced Edition 1080p Ray Tracing Performance Graph

In Chernobylite Enhanced Edition, turning on Ray Tracing, especially on “Ultra” includes Global Illumination, and it is very graphically intense. This is a game, and setting, that greatly pushes Ray Tracing hard and tests the capabilities of Ray Tracing very well. This is where we see the Radeon RX 7600 fail pretty hard in Ray Tracing performance. In fact, even the GeForce RTX 3060 12GB is unplayable and requires DLSS to have playable performance.

The fact is, the Radeon RX 7600 is incredibly bottlenecked in Ray Tracing performance given all the features Ray Tracing enables in this particular game. It’s about 3% faster than the Radeon RX 6600 when using Ray Traced Global Illumination. Even FSR cannot save performance here. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 12GB is 147% faster, and this could be a combination of better Tay Tracing performance, and a higher capacity framebuffer. That said, you still need DLSS on the RTX 3060 to actually play the game with it enabled.

Dying Light 2

Dying Light 2 was released in February 2022 on the PC and uses Techland’s C-Engine. The game supports Ray Tracing, DLSS, and FSR2.  This game supports Ray Tracing environmental effects including Ray Traced Soft Shadows, Ray Traced Ambient Occlusion, Ray Traced Global Illumination, and Ray Traced Reflections.  We utilize the built-in preset option to set “HIGH-QUALITY RAYTRACING” which enables the game’s highest graphics settings plus the environmental effects explained above at the highest values.  The game is run in DX12 Ultimate mode with ASYNC Compute turned on.  We use the built-in benchmark.

Dying Light 2 1080p Ray Tracing Performance Graph

In Dying Light 2 the Radeon RX 7600 is not playable with High Quality Ray Tracing at 1080p, though it does provide 29% performance over the previous generation. The GeForce RTX 3060 12GB ends up being 15% faster than the Radeon RX 7600. Using upscaling, we can actually get playable performance on the Radeon RX 7600 with FSR which brings it up to 60FPS with Ray Tracing, so the game is smooth and playable at that point.

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 was released in December 2020 and uses the REDengine 4. We have the game patched to version 1.62 and use the built-in benchmark. We test using the Graphics Preset option to set graphics settings.  We use the Ray Tracing Graphics Preset of either: “Ray Tracing: Low”, or “Ray Tracing: Medium” or “Ray Tracing: Ultra” as indicated. This game supports DLSS and FSR2.

Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Ray Tracing Performance Graph

Cyberpunk 2077 is naturally incredibly graphically intense with “Ultra” Ray Tracing, even at 1080p. None of the video cards here are playable, and only the GeForce RTX 3060 12GB with DLSS comes the closest to playable. The Radeon RX 7600 is 20% faster than the Radeon RX 6600, and the RTX 3060 12GB is 66% faster than the RX 7600.

Join the discussion in The FPS Review Forums...

REVIEW OVERVIEW

Gaming Performance
9
Power Efficiency
9
Build and Cooling
10
Price Value
10

SUMMARY

We reviewed the AMD Radeon RX 7600 video card and tested it at 1080p, with ray tracing, and FSR in games. The price to performance ratio was very high with this video card, providing an excellent value with competitive performance and a competitive price point. It is built well, and cooling was sufficient, with a higher power utilization compared to the previous generation. It still lacks in ray tracing performance compared to the competition, but its raw performance, and sub $300 price point is appropriate for a video card aiming for a 1080p gameplay experience.

Discussion (12 replies)

Join Discussion →
Marees

Performance is a bit disappointing.

I would have liked something between a 6700xt & 6750xt level.

As the 700watt 7990xtx showed, RDNA 3 can scale in frequencies given the power.

So maybe a 16gb 7600xt that matches 6750xt for $350 is possible !?
Or a 16gb 7600xt that matches 6700xt for $330 !!??

Grimlakin
Grimlakin 👍 1

Lovely review... just making a couple notes.

1. Your math is off with this statement: "Compared to FSR performance on the previous generation RX 6600 the new RX 7700 with FSR is 20% faster." Some quick armchair excel work shows that with FSR compared to the 6600 with FSR the 7600 is actually 23.8 or roughly 24% faster. If you want me to explain my math I'd be glad to! :) Now 20% would be correct to say the 6600 with FSR is 20% slower than the 7600 with FSR. :) I know it's nitpicky... but I'm professionally nitpicky.

I'm not going to armchair math the rest of the statements... Just this one lol.

Interesting review if I were a new gamer on a budget and wanted 1080 gaming I would have no issues using this card.

Marees

"Grimlakin, post: 71647, member: 215" wrote:

if I were a new gamer on a budget and wanted 1080 gaming I would have no issues using this card.

If you can move the budget up by $50, then you get the 12gb 6750xt

https://www.newegg.com/msi-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x-12g-oc/p/N82E16814137735?Item=N82E16814137735

Grimlakin
Grimlakin 👍 1

"Marees, post: 71650, member: 1536" wrote:

If you can move the budget up by $50, then you get the 12gb 6750xt



https://www.newegg.com/msi-rx-6750-xt-mech-2x-12g-oc/p/N82E16814137735?Item=N82E16814137735


AMD fine wine effect will see ftbe 7600 exceed the 6750.

Brent_Justice
Brent_Justice

"Grimlakin, post: 71647, member: 215" wrote:

Lovely review... just making a couple notes.



1. Your math is off with this statement: "Compared to FSR performance on the previous generation RX 6600 the new RX 7700 with FSR is 20% faster." Some quick armchair excel work shows that with FSR compared to the 6600 with FSR the 7600 is actually 23.8 or roughly 24% faster. If you want me to explain my math I'd be glad to! :) Now 20% would be correct to say the 6600 with FSR is 20% slower than the 7600 with FSR. :) I know it's nitpicky... but I'm professionally nitpicky.



I'm not going to armchair math the rest of the statements... Just this one lol.



Interesting review if I were a new gamer on a budget and wanted 1080 gaming I would have no issues using this card.

I double checked the math, FSR to FSR the math seems correct. 104-87/87*100 gives 19.5% performance advantage. Double Checking here: https://www.calculator.net/percent-calculator.html?c3par1=87&c3par2=104&ctype=3&x=43&y=15#pctdifference 104 is a 19.5% increase of 87.

Brent_Justice
Brent_Justice 👍 1

NOTE: I have added a section under the Test Setup Page that clarifies a driver issue that could be skewing results between some reviewers and testing. I just wanted to make this clear, and make it clear what driver we were using, which is the correct one, with all the new performance optimizations for Radeon RX 7600.

https://www.thefpsreview.com/2023/05/24/amd-radeon-rx-7600-video-card-review/2/

Note: we’ve been made aware that a pre-production version of the software driver has been provided by partners, with the version number 23.4.2 in the filename. This driver does not include game and other optimizations for the Radeon RX 7600. If you received this second driver, we strongly encourage you to conduct your testing of Radeon RX 7600 graphics cards with the official press driver made available by AMD named, “AMD-Software-Adrenalin-Edition-23.10.01.16-Win10-Win11-RCP2-Navi33XL-May15.”

This could explain some discrepancies in reviews you see around the web, so just want to put that out there for public knowledge.

In addition, we are also using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU, and remember, at 1080p, where most people are testing, it can lean on CPU performance, even on a video card at this price point. CPU can make a difference in the overall performance spread between two video cards at 1080p.

Grimlakin
Grimlakin

"Brent_Justice, post: 71658, member: 3" wrote:

I double checked the math, FSR to FSR the math seems correct. 104-87/87*100 gives 19.5% performance advantage. Double Checking here: https://www.calculator.net/percent-calculator.html?c3par1=87&c3par2=104&ctype=3&x=43&y=15#pctdifference 104 is a 19.5% increase of 87.


Maybe my arm chair magh was wrong. I need to revoew it again. But it was not the same method the website uses. So I'm thinking my algorithm was incorrect. Easy test if you take 87 and multiply it by 1.195 that should get you the 108. And that does work. My armchair excel was wrong because I derived off of a different equation that just felt right but was oh so wrong.

n

Good review but another 8gb card. Good price for today by AMD and hope to see a 16gb version less than $350. Texture resolution can have such a big impact on image quality while having almost no performance impact if you have the VRam. I hope AMD opens up for AIBs the possibility of 16gb versions.

Marees

"noko, post: 71994, member: 69" wrote:

Good review but another 8gb card. Good price for today by AMD and hope to see a 16gb version less than $350. Texture resolution can have such a big impact on image quality while having almost no performance impact if you have the VRam. I hope AMD opens up for AIBs the possibility of 16gb versions.


16gb 7600 should definitely be possible, because we had 6500xt 8gb

Question is since RDNA 3 is more efficient than RDNA 2, will AMD release a higher TDP version to make it match the performance of 6700xt/6750xt ?

LazyGamer
LazyGamer

"Marees, post: 72009, member: 1536" wrote:

Question is since RDNA 3 is more efficient than RDNA 2, will AMD release a higher TDP version to make it match the performance of 6700xt/6750xt ?


7900XT(X) seem to be more efficient, but that's not the impression I've gotten from 7600 reviews - it has better RT and includes AV1 encoding, but otherwise it's the same perf/watt as RDNA 2 since it's built on the old process?

Marees
Marees 👍 1

"LazyGamer, post: 72010, member: 1367" wrote:

7900XT(X) seem to be more efficient, but that's not the impression I've gotten from 7600 reviews - it has better RT and includes AV1 encoding, but otherwise it's the same perf/watt as RDNA 2 since it's built on the old process?


7600 is 12%-33% more efficient than the 6650xt

Theoretically AMD could double TDP to match performance of 6700xt/6750xt but may not be worth jacking up the TDP so much on a low end card

https://www-computerbase-de.translate.goog/2023-05/amd-radeon-rx-7600-test/3/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-GB#abschnitt_energieeffizienz_in_fps_pro_watt

LazyGamer
LazyGamer 👍 1

They're going to have to do something for the real 'mid-range' cards surely. Hopefully they're close to clearing out their crypto-glut and getting new SKUs out.

Brent Justicehttps://www.thefpsreview.com
Former managing editor of GPUs at HardOCP for 18 years, Brent Justice has been reviewing computer components since the late 90s, educated in the art and method of the computer hardware review, he brings experience, knowledge, and hands-on testing with a gamer-oriented and hardware enthusiast perspective. You can follow him on Twitter - @Brent_Justice You can sub to his YouTube channel - Justice Gaming https://www.youtube.com/c/JusticeGamingChannel You can check out his computer builds on KIT - @BrentJustice https://kit.co/BrentJustice

Recent News