DC Output Quality
For those of you who are curious as to some of the reasoning, equipment, and how our rating system works behind our PSU testing program here at TheFPSReview, we have put together an introduction for you. This program is based on what the author developed at [H]ardOCP and utilizes the equipment bequeathed to the author by Kyle Bennett. The testing we are conducting today is exactly as described in that document and will continue with our examination of the DC Output Quality.
Control Test Graphing
This image is the blank background control test on an unused connector from our SM-8800 during the testing of the STEAMPUNK 850W. This lets us determine what the background noise looks like during testing.
120v Input
100v Input
Test #1 is equal to approximately 25% of the rated capacity of the STEAMPUNK 850W at 45c. This makes Test #1 equal to 221W by loading the 12v rail to 16a, the 5v rail to 2a, the 3.3v rail to 1a, the +5vsb to 2a, and the -12v to 0.3a. The STEAMPUNK 850W is starting off very stable. The 12v rail is peaking at ~15mV while the 5v, and 3.3v rails rail are peaking at less than ~10mV of ripple/noise.
120v Input
100v Input
Test #2 is equal to approximately 50% of the rated capacity of the STEAMPUNK 850W at 45c. This makes Test #2 equal to 431W by loading the 12v rail to 32a, the 5v rail to 4a, the 3.3v rail to 3a, the +5vsb to 2a, and the -12v to 0.3a. Test #2 sees no real change as the 12v rail is coming in at ~15mV of ripple/noise and the minor rails are coming in at ~10mV of ripple/noise.
120v Input
100v Input
Test #3 is equal to approximately 75% of the rated capacity of STEAMPUNK 850W at 45c. This makes Test #3 equal to 636W by loading the 12v rail to 48a, the 5v rail to 6a, the 3.3v rail to 4a, the +5vsb to 2a, and the -12v to 0.3a. Test #3 sees the 12v and 5v rails peaking at ~15mV of ripple/noise while the 3.3v rail is coming in at ~10mV of ripple/noise or less.
120v Input
100v Input
Test #4 is equal to approximately 100% of the rated capacity of the STEAMPUNK 850W at 45c. This makes Test #4 equal to 836W by loading the 12v rail to 68a, the 5v rail to 2a, the 3.3v rail to 2a, the +5vsb to 2a, and the -12v to 0.3a. In the final regular test, we see the 12v rail peaking at ~20mV of ripple/noise while the minor rails are peaking at ~10mV of ripple/noise.
Torture Test
The Torture Test is equal to approximately 80% of the rated capacity of the STEAMPUNK 850W at 45C. This makes the Torture Test equal to 666W by loading the 12v rail to 50a, the 5v rail to 7a, the 3.3v rail to 5a, the +5vsb to 2a, and the -12v to 0.3a. At the end of the Torture Test, we see the 12v rail peaking at ~20mV of ripple/noise while the minor rails are peaking at ~10mV of ripple/noise.
DC Output Quality Summary
The overall DC Output Quality of the 1STPLAYER STEAMPUNK 850W is very good in an absolute sense! The STEAMPUNK 850W ended up posting a peak trace amplitude on the 12v rail of ~20mV followed by ~15mV on the 5v, and ~10mV on the 3.3v rail. The worst relative value among these was the 12v rail hit well below ~50% of the ATX12v specification limit the minor rails did even better!
That means these results are better than the Enermax REVOLUTION DF 850W, MSI A850GF, SilverStone DA850 Gold, and match the ASUS ROG THOR 850W. So, while the absolute values are very good in this aspect, this unit is ALSO keeping pace with the best units we have seen. Let’s move on now and see how all of this wraps up!
Discussion (10 replies)
Join Discussion →That conclusion will likely go into the record books as one of the most severe beatdowns ever.
Thanks for the review Paul!
When I first saw the Overall Score box at zero, I figured maybe he didn't enter any scores in. Then I read the WHOLE article, and "Holy Hell" only puts it mildly. There were moments where I flat out laughed (Probably louder than needed but my lord).
I'm surprised there wasn't a graphic at the end with Mortal Kombat's "Fatality".
Ouch.
So, you are saying you probably wouldn't recommend this unit?
Also, for full affect sub Sh*t for crap in the review....some editing was needed for SEO reasons.
Depends on how much I hate the person I am recommending a product to.
I saw the zero and was hoping there was a photo of the unit on FIRE!!!!!!
I laughed a bunch of times reading this review. Made my day. "the Fail ship" is classic stuff.
Awesome review.
Wow! I wonder if it could be used to make popcorn.
I know I am 2 years late to this party, but is it possible the unit was defective? TPU awarded it "great value" and cultist gave it a B.
So, TPU, Cybernetics and Cultist all use the same test data set* and the incubator is set to 30c if I remember right whereas we set ours at 45c. ATX spec says the units should deliver their rated power up to 50c.
The Lian Li 850w SFX unit we reviewed before this, using the same Helly platform, with the main difference being a 92mm fan instead of 80mm ran, did very well on our tests, this unit popped. I think the fan spec made the difference in the result.
*In practice there are very very very few sites that have load testers and test methodology can vary between being different and being plain wrong. If you look hard enough, you'll realize most of the data out there is from Cybernetics and repacked/published for a number of publications (Anand, Tom's, Cultist, TPU, etc.).