1STPLAYER STEAMPUNK 850W Power Supply Review

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Introduction

1STPLAYER is an interesting brand in that it is essentially a house brand for Helly Technology that was launched in 2010. Helly Technology (Guangzhou) Co. Ltd is a manufacturer of various power supply types and components mostly focused on LED power supplies and peripherals. Having been founded in 2008 they are also one of the newer OEMs providing products to the enthusiast sector.

To date, we have only rarely seen their products in very low-end products that are not what we would normally look at for higher-end systems with serious power demands. In fact, very few of their products have made it into the North American market, and those that have, typically, do not warrant much attention other than to avoid. Today though, it seems that Helly may be trying to provide a more robust set of power supply products for the North American market. So, we are looking forward to seeing what the STEAMPUNK 850W (PS-850SP) can do today.

STEAMPUNK Logo

At Least This Name Isn’t As Bad As The Last 1STPLAYER

The 1STPLAYER STEAMPUNK 850W is the second power supply we have seen from 1STPLAYER as well as one of the few they have ever produced that has been available in North America. This is in spite of the fact that 1STPLAYER has a large presence in the Asian market. Previously, the 1STPLAYER unit we reviewed was a 750W SFX unit and, today, the STEAMPUNK is an ATX12v/EPS 850W unit.

So, we are moving into a much more competitive market as there are just so many options in this realm. Given the large number of products on the market that are in the 850W range and 80 Plus Gold efficiency levels 1STPLAYER is going to have to do a lot of things right and at a great price to dislodge better-known and respected brands. So, with this being a very tough road to hoe, let’s see what 1STPLAYER has to say about this unit:

Behold the 80+ Gold Certified, the latest STEAMPUNK 850W deliver over 92.4% efficiency at typical Loading, even higher than the platinum standard. Copper bars joint mainboard and daughter board to increase conversion efficiency Logically speaking, due to the interval between the daughter board and main PCB, the performance of 80+ full modular psu is not as good as ordinary 80+ psu. To achieve great performance and surpass the opponents, the latest STEAMPUNK 80+ full modular 650W/750W /850W are armed with advanced technology and premium components with competitive price.

Let’s move on now and see what we can expect when a user purchases the 1STPLAYER STEAMPUNK 850W power supply in retail in terms of documentation, accessories, cable count, rail layout, output characteristics, and general build quality.

Join the discussion in The FPS Review Forums...

REVIEW OVERVIEW

SUMMARY

The 1STPLAYER STEAMPUNK 850W is the newest contender to come across our test bench from 1STPLAYER and it turned out to be a turd in a punch bowl. The Voltage regulation was less than competitive, the efficiency was roughly competitive, the noise output was good, and the Transient Load testing results were so bad that I can't even come to a conclusion about what this unit is really. And, I don't say that lightly. I have done this for 16 years and this the worst power supply I have ever seen in this aspect and it failed so bad that we just end the discussion there. Uh, that's it. Do we have some other content after this? Hopefully, because I need mouthwash and mind bleach.

Discussion (10 replies)

Join Discussion →
SeymourGore
SeymourGore 👍 1

That conclusion will likely go into the record books as one of the most severe beatdowns ever.

Space_Ranger

Thanks for the review Paul!

When I first saw the Overall Score box at zero, I figured maybe he didn't enter any scores in. Then I read the WHOLE article, and "Holy Hell" only puts it mildly. There were moments where I flat out laughed (Probably louder than needed but my lord).

I'm surprised there wasn't a graphic at the end with Mortal Kombat's "Fatality".

Brian_B

Ouch.

Grimlakin
Grimlakin 👍 1

So, you are saying you probably wouldn't recommend this unit?

Paul_Johnson

Also, for full affect sub Sh*t for crap in the review....some editing was needed for SEO reasons.

Paul_Johnson
Paul_Johnson 👍 4

"Grimlakin, post: 76696, member: 215" wrote:

So, you are saying you probably wouldn't recommend this unit?


Depends on how much I hate the person I am recommending a product to.

m

I saw the zero and was hoping there was a photo of the unit on FIRE!!!!!!
I laughed a bunch of times reading this review. Made my day. "the Fail ship" is classic stuff.
Awesome review.

Peter_Brosdahl
Peter_Brosdahl

Wow! I wonder if it could be used to make popcorn.

DAPUNISHER

I know I am 2 years late to this party, but is it possible the unit was defective? TPU awarded it "great value" and cultist gave it a B.

D
David_Schroth 👍 2

"DAPUNISHER, post: 98010, member: 10800" wrote:

I know I am 2 years late to this party, but is it possible the unit was defective? TPU awarded it "great value" and cultist gave it a B.


So, TPU, Cybernetics and Cultist all use the same test data set* and the incubator is set to 30c if I remember right whereas we set ours at 45c. ATX spec says the units should deliver their rated power up to 50c.

The Lian Li 850w SFX unit we reviewed before this, using the same Helly platform, with the main difference being a 92mm fan instead of 80mm ran, did very well on our tests, this unit popped. I think the fan spec made the difference in the result.

*In practice there are very very very few sites that have load testers and test methodology can vary between being different and being plain wrong. If you look hard enough, you'll realize most of the data out there is from Cybernetics and repacked/published for a number of publications (Anand, Tom's, Cultist, TPU, etc.).

Paul Johnson
Paul is a long time PC hobbyist and tech enthusiast having gotten his start when he broke his first C64 quickly followed by breaking his first IBM XT. Most notably however, for 12 years, he served as the Power Supply Editor for one of the truly early, groundbreaking, and INDPENDENT PC enthusiast sites ([H]ardOCP) until its mothballing in April of 2019. Paul now brings the same flair and style of his power supply reviews to The FPS Review.

Recent News