Alan Wake 2 Graphics Settings Performance Tested and Compared

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Path Traced Indirect Lighting Performance Compared

On this page we are now going to look at how Path Traced Indirect Lighting affects Ray Tracing performance in Alan Wake 2. In this game, Path Tracing is only used for the Indirect Lighting graphics, not global illumination like Cyberpunk 2077 2.0. This means that we shouldn’t see the large drop or burden on performance that is experienced in Cyberpunk 2077 here. In this game, Path Traced Indirect Lighting might actually be usable, so let’s see what it costs to enable it.

To test this, we again chose to set custom settings for the Ray Tracing options. We started with the High Preset, and then manually lowered the Path Traced Indirect Lighting option from OFF, to Low to Medium to High to see the impact it makes on performance.

4K – Native Rendering with DLAA

Alan Wake 2 4K Path Traced Indirect Lighting Quality Settings Compared Performance

As we can see, with Path Traced Indirect Lighting turned OFF, we start out at 35 FPS with High Ray Tracing options, and Ray Reconstruction is on as well. We are running at 4K display resolution and 4K rendering resolution here. Then, when we enable Path Traced Indirect Lighting we see a drop of only 11% performance. That is very small, considering. Moving up to Medium Path Traced Indirect Lighting the drop is even less at 3%, and then moving up to High drops performance 7%. Therefore, comparing High Path Traced Indirect Lighting to not having it all, is a total performance burden or drop of 20% without DLSS upscaling enabled. Let’s see what DLSS upscaling does below.

4K – Quality DLSS (2560×1440 Rendering Resolution)

Alan Wake 2 4K Path Traced Indirect Lighting Quality Settings Compared with DLSS Performance

DLSS upscaling certainly improves performance, and without Path Traced Indirect Lighting we almost hit 60 FPS at 4K display resolution with Quality DLSS upscaling. Turning on LOW Path Traced Indirect Lighting drops performance 10%, slightly less than without DLSS. The difference between Medium and Low is very small, Medium only drops performance 2%. Going up to High drops performance 4%. Therefore, enabling High Path Traced Indirect Lighting from OFF is a total drop of 15% when DLSS upscaling is enabled, which is less of a burden or drop without using DLSS upscaling.

Join the discussion in our forums...

Brent Justicehttps://www.thefpsreview.com
Former managing editor of GPUs at HardOCP for 18 years, Brent Justice has been reviewing computer components since the late 90s, educated in the art and method of the computer hardware review, he brings experience, knowledge, and hands-on testing with a gamer-oriented and hardware enthusiast perspective. You can follow him on Twitter - @Brent_Justice You can sub to his YouTube channel - Justice Gaming https://www.youtube.com/c/JusticeGamingChannel You can check out his computer builds on KIT - @BrentJustice https://kit.co/BrentJustice

Recent News