Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K CPU Review

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Gaming Performance: (A-D)

We are testing only at 1080p to isolate CPU performance. We are using an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition video card with driver version 595.97. All games are generally being run in their highest settings, though some of the games have had to be lowered to “High” settings so that we could get a more meaningful CPU-limited test. We are running at 1080p native resolution, and no Ray Tracing is turned on in the games that have the option. The same DDR5 7600MT/s RAM was used for both CPUs.

Importantly, we are using ALL manual run-throughs for every game here except two. For Call of Duty: Black Ops 7 we are using the built-in multiplayer benchmark, and for DOOM: The Dark Ages, we are also using the “Reckoning” benchmark. However, we are using Frameview to caputure 1% Lows in these games. For every other game, we are using long manual run-throughs in-game of actual gameplay. We are also recording AVG FPS and 1% Lows and reporting them in the graphs.

Alan Wake 2

Alan Wake 2 Performance Graph - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus versus Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

In Alan Wake 2 at 1080p “High” settings, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 9% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF for the AVG FPS and 4% faster for the 1% Lows. This is pretty significant in this game, which is typically a very graphics-oriented game, but there are some real positive gains here with the new Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus.

Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 Performance Graph - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus versus Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

In Battlefield 6, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is only 1.3% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K for the AVG FPS, and not even 1% faster for the 1% Lows. We are running “Overkill” graphics, but still, we are getting upwards of 200 FPS on the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, so it delivers excellent framerates regardless of high-end GPUs. Perhaps if we lowered the in-game settings, there might be greater separation, but we wanted to show these results since the framerate was very high to begin with.

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

Call of Duty Black Ops 7 Performance Graph - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus versus Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

In Call of Duty: Black Ops 7, to our surprise, it is much like Battlefield 6, just a 1% difference with the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus being slightly faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K. The 1% Lows, though, get a higher boost of about 7% with the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, which is more significant and can impact gameplay positively. At any rate, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is capable of over 200FPS framerate at the “Extreme” setting.

Clair Obscur: Expedition 33

Clair Obscur Expedition 33 Performance Graph - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus versus Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

In Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 we did have to set the game down to the “High” graphics settings instead of Epic, because at Epic it was still far too GPU-bound with similar results around 90FPS between both CPUs. On the “High” game setting, we can see that the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 4% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, with the 1% Lows at a 3% difference. We suspect that this game is still GPU-bound even at High. Since it is one of those games that always uses ray tracing lighting, it’s just very GPU-dependent. However, we can see the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has helped slightly, not much, but just a little. With the RTX 5090, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus can deliver over 100FPS for 1% Lows, which is impressive.

Crimson Desert

Crimson Desert Performance Graph - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus versus Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

We are using Crimson Desert for the first time, and we have a long manual run-through once inside the world. We can walk through town areas with NPCs for CPU testing, and other areas for GPU testing. Note that for the tests shown above, we are using the game patched to version 1.03.00 dated 4/11. This represents a much more up-to-date performance comparison with the game, with recent fixes and improvements in the game. Though we have the “Cinematic” option quality enabled, we have manually turned off Ray Tracing.

In Crimson Desert, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 6% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K, which, for this game, makes a difference, especially in the township or castle areas. The 1% Lows are 2% faster on the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus allows over 100FPS 1% Lows, making for smooth gameplay.

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 Performance Graph - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus versus Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Keep in mind that Cyberpunk 2077 is one of the games on the Intel Binary Optimization Tool list, and we have that feature enabled along with APO on both CPUs. Here, we can see that the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 6% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and 7% faster in 1% Lows, which is nice.

Doom: The Dark Ages

Doom The Dark Ages Performance Graph - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus versus Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

In Doom: The Dark Ages, we are running at the “Ultra Nightmare” settings, which are the highest settings. The new Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 3% faster on AVG, but 5% faster on 1% Lows. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus allows up to 120FPS 1% Lows, which is great.

Join the discussion in The FPS Review Forums...

Brent Justicehttps://www.thefpsreview.com
Former managing editor of GPUs at HardOCP for 18 years, Brent Justice has been reviewing computer components since the late 90s, educated in the art and method of the computer hardware review, he brings experience, knowledge, and hands-on testing with a gamer-oriented and hardware enthusiast perspective. You can follow him on Twitter - @Brent_Justice You can sub to his YouTube channel - Justice Gaming https://www.youtube.com/c/JusticeGamingChannel You can check out his computer builds on KIT - @BrentJustice https://kit.co/BrentJustice

Recent News