MSI GeForce RTX 4080 16GB GAMING X TRIO Video Card Review

The FPS Review may receive a commission if you purchase something after clicking a link in this article.

Test Setup

Please read the information on our GPU testing procedures and methodology here.  Note that our GPU Testing Bench has been upgraded to the AMD AM5 platform and a Ryzen 9 7900X CPU with DDR5 is being used.

MSI GeForce RTX 4080 16GB GAMING X TRIO System Setup Table

System Setup

We are using the motherboard’s current default BIOS settings on the latest release BIOS. We have enabled PCI-Express Resizable BAR in the motherboard BIOS.  This means we are utilizing Resizable BAR on NVIDIA GPUs and AMD Smart Access Memory on AMD GPUs in all our testing.  We have enabled EXPO I in the BIOS for the memory.

We are using a fresh install of Windows 11 Pro with the latest Windows Updates, including the 22H2 Fall 2022 update. We have the latest drivers installed including the latest chipset drivers from AMD.  We are using the “Best Performance” power profile in Windows Settings.  Hardware Accelerated GPU Scheduling is ENABLED in Windows.  VBS is DISABLED and Game Mode is ENABLED.

Join the discussion in The FPS Review Forums...

REVIEW OVERVIEW

Gaming Performance
8
Overclocking and Performance
10
Build and Cooling
10
Price Value
6

SUMMARY

We reviewed the MSI GeForce RTX 4080 16GB GAMING X TRIO, which performed beyond the previous generation video cards. It has a high factory overclock and has overclocking headroom which resulted in a good overclock with decent performance uplift. It has a robust build, and pleasing aesthetic, with excellent thermals, and cooling in a quiet profile. It does take up a lot of space, beware of size. Overall it is a great gaming video card that demands a price point higher-than-normal we are used to for a video card in this range.

Discussion (19 replies)

Join Discussion →
Brian_B

It was almost twice as fast as the RTX 3080 Ti but at 10% less power.

Now this is just one result, but it's the one singled out on the summary page where the above statement is also located, and going back to the game benches it looks fairly typical:

In Call of Duty Modern Warfare II the MSI GeForce RTX 4080 16GB GAMING X TRIO was able to provide a smooth and enjoyable gameplay experience at 4K with maximum settings nearing 100FPS. This beat the RTX 3090 Ti by 23% and the RTX 3080 Ti by 39%.

Ok.. 10% less power - check. But 39% isn't anywhere close to twice as fast, is it?

Other than that one bit of math, which I admit I'm not certain I'm correct on even - good writeup. Looks like a great card. I'm still suspect on the pricing but it's definitely bringing the game.

*edit*

Is this graphic correct:

The 3080Ti and 4080OC Board Powers are identical, while the 4080 chip draws almost 100W more power? Also curious, the 3080Ti draws less board power than a 3090?

Makes me wonder - what's on the Ampere boards that is causing them to draw so much power aside from the GPU itself? Or is it just bad readouts from GPU-Z or on-board monitoring?

I know GDDR6X is going to use some decent power, but all these cards (except the AMD) are using it to various degrees.

m

How much does it cost????

Brent_Justice
Brent_Justice

"Brian_B, post: 62918, member: 96" wrote:

Now this is just one result, but it's the one singled out on the summary page where the above statement is also located, and going back to the game benches it looks fairly typical:







Ok.. 10% less power - check. But 39% isn't anywhere close to twice as fast, is it?



Other than that one bit of math, which I admit I'm not certain I'm correct on even - good writeup. Looks like a great card. I'm still suspect on the pricing but it's definitely bringing the game.

I averaged the performance gain. And the power savings is even more in other games, Cyberpunk 2077 is where the power efficiency was rated, and that was the worst-case scenario, in reality, the power savings in other games over the 3080 is even greater. There are games where it sits under 300W.

Brian_B

"Brent_Justice, post: 62921, member: 3" wrote:

I averaged the performance gain.


Just eyeballing it, but even an average gain was somewhere in the 30% range? Not 100%, which would be "double". Nothing hit 100% that I saw compared to the 3080Ti.

Brian_B

"magoo, post: 62919, member: 244" wrote:

How much does it cost????


If you have to ask...

That really is the correct answer to this question. 4090 looks like a better deal, and for some of those AIBs, about the same price.

Brent_Justice
Brent_Justice 👍 1

"Brian_B, post: 62922, member: 96" wrote:

Just eyeballing it, but even an average gain was somewhere in the 30% range? Not 100%, which would be "double". Nothing hit 100% that I saw compared to the 3080Ti.

I can see how that can be confusing, I think some of that was with DLSS 3 Frame Generation in mind. I've updated the text accordingly in both reviews.

Denpepe

Hmm, I'm dissapointed I can only find 4K benchmarks, and while those have some interest, from other reviews I seen that the 4080 sometimes get's beaten by 3000 series cards at lower resolutions.

Also somewhat dissapointed there are no test results with a 3080 which this card is supposed to replace even if the price would suggest otherwise.

S

"Denpepe, post: 62927, member: 284" wrote:

Hmm, I'm dissapointed I can only find 4K benchmarks, and while those have some interest, from other reviews I seen that the 4080 sometimes get's beaten by 3000 series cards at lower resolutions.



Also somewhat dissapointed there are no test results with a 3080 which this card is supposed to replace even if the price would suggest otherwise.


There are some 1440p scores and a comparison with the RTX3080 as well

Brent_Justice
Brent_Justice 👍 2

"Denpepe, post: 62927, member: 284" wrote:

Hmm, I'm dissapointed I can only find 4K benchmarks, and while those have some interest, from other reviews I seen that the 4080 sometimes get's beaten by 3000 series cards at lower resolutions.



Also somewhat dissapointed there are no test results with a 3080 which this card is supposed to replace even if the price would suggest otherwise.

My Founders Edition review has two pages of 1440p results.

Grimlakin

After scanning through this review... this generation of cards I think are actually bringing 4k to the upper tier gaming to be a easily enjoyable experience.

m

"Brian_B, post: 62923, member: 96" wrote:

If you have to ask...



That really is the correct answer to this question. 4090 looks like a better deal, and for some of those AIBs, about the same price.


Not so.
This card gives roughly 75% of a 4090 in performance at 4K.
If the card is more than msrp then it is not worth it. May as well buy a 4090.

Brian_B

"magoo, post: 62947, member: 244" wrote:

Not so.

This card gives roughly 75% of a 4090 in performance at 4K.

If the card is more than msrp then it is not worth it. May as well buy a 4090.


Didn't we just say the same thing? :unsure:

ASUS RTX 4080 STRIX OC
$1450
16 GB, GDDR6X, 256-bit
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Niner51

"Grimlakin, post: 62935, member: 215" wrote:

After scanning through this review... this generation of cards I think are actually bringing 4k to the upper tier gaming to be a easily enjoyable experience.


I honestly didn't notice an issue with 4K gaming and my 3090 Ti with everything maxed out, but the 4090 is a lot smoother.

Brent_Justice
Brent_Justice

"magoo, post: 62919, member: 244" wrote:

How much does it cost????


$1309.99 MSRP

Peter_Brosdahl
Peter_Brosdahl 👍 1

Oofta! With pricing like that who knew you could offer something that makes the top-tier card look appealing? It's a nice card but other than power savings I'm not sure what the incentive to get one over a 4090 would be. I can understand picking it over a 3080/3090/3090 Ti but not a 4090.

I'm still pretty happy with my Hybrid 3090 Ti. For giggles, I ran my OC settings on it on Sunday for a few hours with CP 2077 (Driver 525 and latest 1.61 build), RT med, DLSS performance, and just about everything else completely maxed (sans any post-processing like motion blur which I always turn off completely) and it was holding 60-66 FPS at 4K (2160-2175 MHz), with a max temp ~61c. At its stock settings (2040-2050 MHz), and so quiet, it averages 50-60+, with occasional dips in the high 40s and temps ~50-60c, but still a very enjoyable experience.

Brent Justicehttps://www.thefpsreview.com
Former managing editor of GPUs at HardOCP for 18 years, Brent Justice has been reviewing computer components since the late 90s, educated in the art and method of the computer hardware review, he brings experience, knowledge, and hands-on testing with a gamer-oriented and hardware enthusiast perspective. You can follow him on Twitter - @Brent_Justice You can sub to his YouTube channel - Justice Gaming https://www.youtube.com/c/JusticeGamingChannel You can check out his computer builds on KIT - @BrentJustice https://kit.co/BrentJustice

Recent News